Thursday, October 1, 2026

The Gift of Shalom- Yom Kippur Morning 2026

 Yom Kippur Morning 5787

The Gift of Shalom

September 21, 2027

Rabbi Alan Cook

Sinai Temple, Champaign, Illinois

 

Recently, I received an email from Bill Gingold.  A friend and neighbor of his, a devoted Christian, had some questions about Jewish theology that Bill didn’t feel equipped to answer.  Would I mind meeting with this friend to help him sort through his ideas?

I agreed and we arranged a time to talk.  What was on Chris’ mind was the question of shalom.  Did I believe that Judaism teaches that it is possible for us to achieve true shalomin our lifetime?

Now, of course, much of the answer to that question hinges upon how we choose to define shalom.  Often, we translate the word as “peace,” a cessation from war and conflict.  And some may rightfully be skeptical as to whether humanity will ultimately relinquish its thirst for power and dominance in order to achieve that level of shalom.

But the notion of shalom goes deeper than peace.  The root shin, lamed, mem relates to ideas of fullness and wholeness.  The prayerbook series used by our Egalitarian Traditional Minyan has been titled Lev Shalem, “a complete heart.”  In the Mi Shebeirach, we pray for refuah sh’leimah, “a complete healing.”  When I offer the priestly benediction to B’nai Mitzvah students, which concludes with the phrase, v’yasem l’cha shalom, I pray that God will bless them with the greatest blessing of all, the blessings of wholeness, and comfort, and peace.

In some ways, perhaps the question of translation is less important than we might think.    Can one ultimately be whole, in a state of comfort, if they are not at peace?  Can any of us truly feel shalom when wars are raging in our world, including those being fought in our name?

For more than an hour, Chris and I unpacked our personal beliefs about shalom, as well as those that we have been taught by our respective faiths.  Toward the end, I suggested a metaphor: shalom is a gift.  It’s been provided for us.  Maybe it got buried behind the other presents, ignored in favor of bigger, flashier gifts with shinier wrapping paper.  But now it’s time for us to dust off the box and unwrap this gift we’ve been given.

I know this may sound Pollyanna-ish[1].  It is increasingly difficult to envision a world of shalom when bellicose politicians seem constantly to be inventing new ways to incite conflict.  But I do believe that we have been given the tools for shalom— within our world; between ourselves and our neighbors; and within ourselves.  We need only to insert the batteries and understand the instructions.

The early crafters of Reform Jewish liturgy decided that an alternative Torah reading was required for this morning of Yom Kippur.  They discarded the traditional text from Leviticus, which focuses on the priestly responsibilities and includes instructions for selecting a “scapegoat” to which the community would symbolically transfer their sins before sending the creature off into the wilderness.  Instead, the liturgists chose the passage from Parashat Nitzavim in the latter chapters of the book of Deuteronomy.  Moses, making his valedictory address to the Israelite community, empowers each individual to accept responsibility for, and control over, their connection to the teachings and traditions of their heritage.  “Lo bashamayim hi,” the Torah emphatically proclaims, “It is not in the heavens, that you should say, ‘Who among us can go up to the heavens and get it for us and impart it to us, that we may observe it?’ Neither is it beyond the sea, that you should say, ‘Who among us can cross to the other side of the sea and get it for us and impart it to us, that we may observe it?’”[2]

Certainly, a key factor in the Reform machzor favoring Deuteronomy over Leviticus is that references to the sacrificial cult don’t necessarily resonate with contemporary audiences.  But I think there’s a significant theological issue at play, as well.  The contrast between the two Torah passages is striking.  In Leviticus, responsibility for the community’s sins is symbolically placed upon the scapegoat.  In Deuteronomy, Moses offers a radically different image:  what we need to guide us toward a life of holiness is not impossibly distant.  It is already close to us—in our mouths and in our hearts.

And this raises an important question for Yom Kippur: What if shalom is also closer than we might imagine?  What if the responsibility for moving toward it does not rest solely with governments, politicians, religious leaders, or diplomats?  What if some portion of that responsibility belongs to us?

Shalom within our world means more than just the cessation of war and conflict, though that is certainly something to which I believe we should aspire.  To me, shalom means recognizing the right of all people to be shalem – to be whole.  It means the freedom to live with dignity and security.  It means being able to worship openly, to determine one’s own future, to have one’s basic needs met, and to exercise agency over one’s own life.  It means not merely tolerating one another’s presence, but working to create a world in which people can flourish.

When I was growing up, these were the sorts of issues and domestic policies that I was taught were consistent with Jewish values.  As I’ve spent my adult life reading and thinking about how Judaism instructs us to respond to the needs of society, I have increasingly become convinced that advocacy on these matters is consistent with the prophetic tradition and our vision of tikkun olam.  Others may draw different conclusions from our texts and teachings. That is part of the richness—and the challenge—of Jewish tradition.  But disagreement does not absolve us of the responsibility to engage seriously with our tradition, and with the consequences of the values we claim to hold.  

What’s not OK, in my opinion, is failure to engage at all in the effort to bring shalom to our world.  If we have the batteries that can power the path toward shalom, and we withhold them, then we have failed in our responsibility to our fellow human beings.  I don’t believe that the quest for shalom is a zero-sum game.  In a world of true equity and shalom, one group’s dreams and aspirations need not be denied or diminished in order for another’s to flourish.

In my conversation with Chris, I found myself thinking about one of the differences between Christian and Jewish approaches to the question of how we bring shalom into our world.  Christianity offers followers a central figure whose life and teachings are meant to provide a model for how they are called to live.  While Judaism certainly has teachers and prophets who leave us with importance guidance, our tradition places an enormous responsibility upon each of us to wrestle individually with Torah, to interpret it, and ultimately to decide what we are going to do with it.  Judaism does not permit us to outsource the work.

The Book of Kings tells the story of the prophet Elijah.  Dejected and downhearted—being a prophet was thankless work—Elijah flees into the wilderness.  Having walked for forty days and forty nights, he seeks shelter in a cave, where God appears to ask him, “Mah l’cha po, Eliyahu? Why are you here, Elijah?”[3]

The question God poses to Elijah is also tacitly posed to us each day: why are we here?  For Elijah, it’s a question of physical location; why has he chosen to hide in a remote cave when he has work to do.  But for each of us, the question is more existential: what is our purpose in this world, and how will we act to contribute to shalom?

God does not ask Elijah why the world is so broken.  God asks, “Why are you here?”  In that moment, shalom goes from being a global concern to a personal one.  The question is not about what particular politicians should do or what laws or public policies should be enacted or enforced.  Rather, we are asked to examine:

 

What am I doing?  What is my responsibility?

 

Why are you here?

Not “why are you here on earth” in some abstract sense, but:

Why are you here in this congregation?

Why are you here on Yom Kippur?

Why are you here in this particular moment in Jewish history?

What have you been given?

And what are you going to do with it?

 

To return to today’s Torah portion , once Moses reminds the people that Torah is “not in the heavens,” and that they do not need an intermediary to access its teachings, he elaborates.  The mitzvot, he states, are close to each of us, “in [our] hands and our mouths, that [we] may do them.”[4]

 

If these are the places where Torah resides, then, by extension, this is where we can find shalom.

 

Shalom is in our mouths—in the words we speak to one another, even to those with whom we disagree.  Shalom in our speech requires us to be measured in our language, to avoid name-calling and slander.  It asks us to strive to ensure that what we say is factual, and to avoid repeating hearsay and gossip.  Shalom in our speech encourages us to model the middah- the Jewish value- of dan l’chaf z’chut, giving others the benefit of the doubt.  This is not to say that we hold our tongues in the face of mistreatment or abuse, but that, where possible, we strive toward conversation and dialogue that builds bridges of understanding and cooperation.

 

Shalom is in our hearts—in the relationships we build, in the empathy that we feel toward others.  As we recognize that our neighbors; the strangers on the street; the people halfway around the world whom we’ve never met, living in cities we can’t spell, let alone locate on a map all have the same dreams and aspirations, all are on a quest to achieve their own idea of what shalom may be, perhaps we can begin to imagine pathways toward this reality.  We need not agree fully with the actions or beliefs of an individual in order to understand their desire for basic resources, for warmth and shelter, for dignity, and for shalom.  We’re all in this world together, and the more we open our hearts to that reality, the closer we can get to shalom.

 

Shalom is in our hands—in the actions we take when we roll up our sleeves and work in partnership with God to bring about tikkun olam, the perfection of the world according to God’s original intent.

 

Shalom is not going to be brought about merely through feel-good moments.  We could herd everyone into a giant arena to sing kumbaya at an “Up With People” concert, but the impact would be fleeting.  While such moments can be significant insofar as they show us that being together in diverse community is beautiful and important, it takes ongoing and arduous effort to achieve lasting shalom.  In this New Year, how will you do your part to bring it closer to reality?  What will you say?  What will you feel?  What will you do?

 

The late Rabbi Harold Schulweis told the following story:

 

A Hasidic master once asked his students, “What is the most important moment in all of Jewish history?” And the students answered readily.  

 

One student offered, “The moment God gave us Torah on Mount Sinai!”

 

A second countered, “The day the Holy Temple was erected [in Jerusalem]!”

 

Another member of the class proclaimed, “When the great sage Maimonides sat down to write the Code of Jewish Law!”

 

“No, my children,” responded the rebbe.  “The greatest moment in Jewish history is now. This moment. All of the other moments that you mentioned are great. But they mean nothing if they have no place in this moment. This moment, right now, is the greatest moment in Jewish history.”[5]

 

I don’t think that Rabbi Schulweis offered this story to suggest that this moment is necessarily more important than Sinai. We have no guarantee that this moment will be remembered by anyone a thousand years from now. Certainly, in addition to the moments of simcha that many of us hopefully have been blessed to enjoy in our lifetimes, this moment is presenting the Jewish community worldwide with significant angst and tsuris that we would likely prefer not to see reverberating throughout time.  But the various moments in history recounted by the students in the story only have meaning because we, today, have decided that they do.  We are the ones who have decided to maintain continuity to those key moments in our Jewish past.  In a similar manner, we are empowered by the knowledge we have gleaned from all the generations who came before to work toward achieving some semblance of shalom in our generation.

 

There’s nothing that we can do that will instantaneously end war, or curb antisemitism, or eradicate socio-economic inequities, or repair the deep fissures of division that exist in our society.  But that does not mean that we are absolved of the responsibility to make our efforts, one small step at a time, to contribute to solutions.

 

Perhaps shalom is truly a gift.  But the best gifts are not those that are admired from afar. Ideally, gifts are accepted so that we can enjoy them and put them to good use.

 

So let us be grateful that we’ve been given the possibility of shalom, and strive to appreciate and utilize this gift in the coming year.

 

The batteries are in our hands.

 



[1] Derived from a character created by author Eleanor H. Porter and later the subject of several films.  Pollyanna maintains an always-cheerful disposition and finds something to be glad about in ever situation.

[2] Deuteronomy 30:12-14

[3] I Kings 19:9

[4] Deuteronomy 30:14

[5] As told by Rabbi Ed Feinstein in his eulogy for Rabbi Harold Schulweis

The Heart Shaped Tin- Kol Nidre 2026

 

The Heart Shaped Tin

Kol Nidre 5787

September 20, 2026

Rabbi Alan Cook

Sinai Temple, Champaign, Illinois

 

When I was younger, my siblings and I would cajole my mother into promising us things: certain toys we had our eyes on, desired foods that weren’t likely to make it onto the regular grocery lists, or trips to favorite fun tourist destinations (there were plenty of those in South Florida during our childhood).  Our memories were ferocious; if she didn’t deliver on a particular item, we would be sure to remind her rather mercilessly.

 

One year, she came up with an ingenious solution to curtail our incessant nagging about a store we wanted to go to.  She said, “I know I promised, and I’ll do my best.  But Yom Kippur is approaching.  If we haven’t made it by then, Kol Nidre erases my pledge.”

 

Now, in hindsight, I can say pretty confidently that she expressed this lovingly and with tongue firmly planted in cheek.  As she knew, Kol Nidre isn’t intended to absolve us of those day-to-day insubstantial guarantees we make to family members, co-worker, or peers; but rather it is designed to address the more consequential vows we might undertake that we might find ourselves unable to fulfill.  In the medieval period, when Kol Nidre is believed to have originated, the Jewish community was often compelled under great duress to make promises that they could not in good conscience fulfill—at least not while remaining true to their faith.  It is only more recently, in the last century or two, that people have applied it to other sorts of agreements.

But there is one promise that Kol Nidre does not dissolve.  Nor do I believe we would want it to.  That is the promise of love and memory that we accept when we enter into relationship with a friend or family member.  When we say to someone for whom we care deeply, “I will never forget you,” how do we work to fulfill such a promise?

 

In my twenty-three years in the rabbinate, thirteen of which I’ve been blessed to share with you, I’ve been responsible for making such promises to many—on my own behalf, and on behalf of our community.  They were mothers and fathers; they were sons and daughters; they were loving spouses; they were treasured friends; they enriched this community through their music, through their teaching, through their volunteer participation, through their service to this congregation, through their involvement with the university, through their civic engagement.  Their memories and legacies are indelibly inscribed upon our hearts and minds; their presence is deeply felt each time we gather in this sacred space.  If we pause to listen, I am certain we will hear their voices.

 

In September of 2011, author Maurice Sendak had one of his final recorded interviews with NPR’s Terry Gross.  He spoke of his pain at having outlived so many of the people who had been so important to him, particularly his longtime partner, psychiatrist and writer Eugene Glynn, who had died four years prior.  Sendak told Gross, "I’m not unhappy about becoming old. I’m not unhappy about what must be. I cry a lot because I miss people. They die and I can’t stop them. They leave me and I love them more."[1]

 

As Sendak recognized, we are who we are because of the complex webs of relationships that we forge with others.  They guide and shape us—some in monumental fashion, some in ways that are less perceptible.  We honor the vows we have made—overtly or implicitly—to sustain their memory and their legacy.

Sendak closed the conversation with three pieces of advice to Gross: “Live your life.  Live your life.  Live your life.”[2]  This, perhaps, is a key teaching of this holy moment of Yom Kippur, yet one that we often overlook.  We are taught that on this day, we are to “afflict our souls,”[3] a mitzvah that many choose to fulfill through fasting.  Yet Judaism does not ask us to adopt a fully ascetic lifestyle.  Though we are asked to engage in introspection and atonement, two tasks we should each take seriously, we are not expected to engage in self-flagellation throughout the year, to continually dwell on our foibles and missteps that result from our innate human frailties.  Rather, we are taught to use Yom Kippur as a day to reflect—and where necessary, to reset—but to then spend the remainder of the year living life to its fullest, making good use of the gifts and opportunities with which we have been blessed.

 

To be clear: Yom Kippur is NOT a “get out of jail free” card.  Our tradition is clear that the one who says to themselves, “I will sin and then repent, and then sin again”[4] is not absolved by Yom Kippur.  My point is that Judaism wants us to enjoy and appreciate all that life has to offer (within reason and moderation, of course), and we do best homage to those who have come before us when we do indeed celebrate life to its fullest.

 

Our friend and teacher Ray Spooner kept a blog chronicling his battle with ALS.  In his final post, which he arranged to have published on the morning of his death, he offered words of advice which echo Maurice Sendak’s exhortation.  Ray wrote, “It may sound simplistic but it can change your life if you live by it. And that is if there is something that is important to you to do or say, do it. Do it now.”[5]  Many of you will recall that Ray created a colorfully-titled list—the name rhymed with “bucket” enumerating the things he hoped to accomplish before his illness robbed him of the ability to do so.  We would each do well to create similar lists, in an effort not to allow that which is important to us to go unsaid or undone.  

 

Author Bee Wilson has written a beautiful book of interconnected essays called The Heart Shaped Tin, about how we ascribe meaning to objects.  She focuses particularly on kitchen objects, with the title of the book being inspired by a cake pan she cannot bring herself to dispose of, even though it is indelibly linked in her mind to her unfaithful ex-husband.  She notes, “The things we surround ourselves with at home are a way to curate the past into a version of it that we can bear.”[6]  She cites the Soviet psychologist Lev Vygotsky, who wrote, “the very essence of civilization consists of purposively building monuments so as not to forget.”[7]

 

Wilson devotes a chapter to the story of a friend who had a treasured set of delicate China dishes that had been passed down in her family for a generation or two.  They were kept carefully wrapped in storage boxes in her attic, being saved to be brought out on special occasions.  You can probably guess the punchline: no occasion was every deemed “special” enough, and the dishes continued to languish in storage.  Then, the husband of the owner of the dishes received a devastating medical diagnosis indicating that he had a terminal illness.  That became the wakeup call they needed to pull the dishes out of storage and start using them as their everyday place settings.[8]

 

Maurice Sendak, Ray Spooner, and Bee Wilson each in their own way remind us of the importance of making the most of a moment when it is available to us.  It is unlikely that we would ever lament having spent “too much” time with those whom we love, yet the converse is often painful as we lament that we did not get one more opportunity to share precious time with one another.  Yom Kippur can remind us to be present, to live each day to its fullest, to treasure every memory and every object.  I believe this is actually a key principle of the festival: to continue to refine the acts of teshuvah and self-improvement in such a way that when our actual day of judgment arrives, we can enter into that moment without regrets.

 

As many of you know, my mother died in November of 2024.  My father spent the past few months relocating, and so he has downsized considerably.  He offered many items to me and my siblings, including artwork, Judaica, and family memorabilia.  While some in my household gravitated towards items that would be of practical use in our home, that was a secondary concern for me.  I selected items that had sentimental value; seeing or holding them stirs a dormant memory or releases a flood of endorphins as I consider each object. The knowledge that someone whom I love cared enough to collect, curate, and preserve these items imbues them with special meaning that far exceeds their original purpose.  As Wilson writes, “This is the power of objects; they keep those we miss in the room with us.”[9]  Wilson goes on to say, “it is possible to hanker deeply after something which is neither pretty nor useful, just because of the person who once used it. The fact that no one needs it anymore is exactly what makes the wanting so fierce, because it reminds you of a time when you were needed too.”[10]  I may have no practical use for the years of Hebrew Bazooka comics my mother collected.  Yet knowing that they held some significance for her is enough to make me preserve them.

 

Wilson asserts that “one of the differences between an object and a human being is that the object never changes.”[11]  She adds, “The magic of things is that they can live more than once, passing faithfully through many pairs of hands, gaining different meanings each time. …the meaning of objects is never fixed; it can change in a heartbeat.”[12]

Thus, when our loved ones are gone, we can cling to the objects we associate with them.  For a brief moment of memory while we contemplate these objects, we can pause time’s steady march and perhaps imagine that the person themselves—and not merely the memento associated with them—is present with us.  

 

This is why we collect the things that were precious to those whom we love.  This is why we heed the advice of those such as Maurice Sendak and Ray Spooner, reminding us to live our lives fully in the company of those whom we cherish.  This is why we continue telling stories, in dedication to the vows we have made to preserve a web of relationship that death cannot sever.

 

A story is told of the Ba’al Shem Tov, the founder of Chasidic Judaism.  Many of you have likely heard it in some form:

 

When the great Rabbi Israel Baal Shem-Tov saw misfortune threatening the Jews it was his custom to go into a certain part of the forest to meditate. There he would light a fire, say a special prayer, and the miracle would be accomplished and misfortune averted.

 

Later, when his disciple, the celebrated Magid of Mezritch, had occasion, for the same reason, to intercede with heaven, he would go to the same place in the forest and say: “Master of the Universe, listen! I do not know how to light the fire, but I am still able to say the prayers.” And again the miracle would be accomplished.

 

Still later, Rabbi Moshe-Leib of Sasov, in order to save his people once more, would go into the forest and say: “I do not know how to light the fire, I do not know the prayer, but I know the place and this must be sufficient.” It was sufficient, and the miracle was accomplished.

 

Then it fell to Rabbi Israel of Rizhyn to overcome misfortune. Sitting in his armchair, his head in his hands, he spoke to God: “I am unable to light the fire and I do not know the prayer; I cannot even find the place in the forest. All I can do is to tell the story, and that must be sufficient.” And it was sufficient.[13]

 

There will come a time when those whom we care about will exist only in our stories.  It is therefore incumbent upon us, like Rabbi Israel of Rizhyn, to continue telling these stories, to keep their names and deeds upon our lips, in service to the vow of memory we have been entrusted to uphold.

 

For all of the vows we have made in the past year unthinkingly or under duress, all of the oaths we have unintentionally sworn, may the evening of Kol Nidre absolve us.  But the pledges we have made in love, consciously or unconsciously, and the promises we have sworn to create indelible memories and preserve them until our own final days, may these endure as a lasting legacy.



[1] “Maurice Sendak: On Life, Death, and Children’s Lit,” Fresh Air.  Originally aired on December 29, 2011 (but was recorded in September).  Transcript retrieved from https://www.npr.org/transcripts/144077273 August 27, 2026

[2] Ibid

[3] Leviticus 23:7, in the instructions for Yom Kippur

[4] See Mishnah Yoma 8:9

[5] “Obit (An Acceptable Word in Words With Friends)” on www.rayslittleride.com .  Retrieved August 31, 2026.

[6] Wilson, Bee.  The Heart-Shaped Tin. (New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 2025) p. 47

[7] Ibid

[8] Wilson, p. 9-15

[9] Ibid

[10] Ibid, p. 251

[11] Ibid, p. 69

[12] Ibid, p. 286

[13] Wiesel, Elie. The Gates of the Forest. Translated by Frances Frenaye. (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966)

It's a Beautiful Day to Yell at God - Rosh Hashanah Morning 2026

 It’s a Beautiful Day to Yell at God

Rosh Hashanah Morning 5787

September 12/13, 2026

Rabbi Alan Cook

Sinai Temple, Champaign, Illinois

 

Last fall, one of my Facebook friends shared a post that included this picture [that’s now appearing on the screens].  

 



[1]

The drawing is simple, almost as though done by a child.  Three figures face an enormous sun, their backs turned toward the viewer.  The title reads, “It’s a Beautiful Day to Yell at God,” and the figures shout, “What the F…,” “Come Out!  We Just Wanna Talk,” and “Face Us, You Coward.”   I don’t know who the artist is, nor when exactly this piece was created, but the sentiments being expressed by the figures in the illustration certainly are echoed by many in contemporary society.  We’re sad or scared or frustrated, and we want some explanations or reassurances from the Master of all creation.  So we, too, might be inclined to yell.

In my first year of rabbinical school in Jerusalem, my teacher, Moshe Silberstein, introduced me to a way of thinking about Jewish prayer which he called “A.C.T.”—Audacious Covenant Theology.[2]  He posited that if we truly believe that God is omniscient, omniscient, and omnipresent—or even if we take a slightly more limited view of God’s abilities—it is chutzpahdik to expect that God would hear and respond to our prayers.  Yet we nevertheless continue to pray because we understand ourselves to be party to a covenantal, symbiotic relationship with God.  In this worldview, we have the audacity to assert that God needs us just as much as humanity needs God.

In the pre-patriarchal texts of the Torah, God does not consult at all with humanity for feedback on any Divine undertakings.  God punishes Cain without saying to Adam and Eve, “Your son just committed fratricide.  What should the consequences be?”  God tells Noah to build an ark in preparation for the destruction of humanity, but does not solicit feedback on this plan (and Noah, though righteous in his generation,[3] does not think to intervene).  It is only when Abraham comes on the scene that God begins to interact with humanity in such a way that we feel comfortable to offer feedback.  So Abraham intercedes on behalf of the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.[4]

Abraham is the first recorded figure in the Torah to display the audacity to argue with God—like the individuals in our illustration, he dares to ask “WTF” (if you’re not familiar with that acronym, and can’t decipher it from context, ask a young person seated near you).  Abraham asks, “HaShophet kol ha-aretz lo ya’aseh mishpat? Shall the judge of all the earth not behave justly?”[5]  In taking the first tentative steps toward monotheism, in forging a new understanding of the world that placed a single, omnipotent God at its center, Abraham had come to anticipate that God would adhere to certain standards of fairness and justice.  So when God appears to violate that understanding, Abraham feels compelled to raise questions.

Some have argued that Abraham does not go far enough.  He stops advocating on behalf of the doomed cities when God agrees to spare them if ten righteous people can be found.  Why not continue the negotiation to fully deter God from the planned destruction?  And how could Abraham be so vociferous in advocating on behalf of the sinful denizens of a city he had never visited, yet fail to intervene during the events of our Torah portion today, the infamous “Binding of Isaac,” wherein his own child’s life is on the line?

As Rabbi Silberstein taught, we have the audacity to believe that we have the right to ask almost anything of God.  But is it fair to anticipate that God will always (or even frequently) answer our queries in the affirmative?

In the 2003 film, Bruce Almighty,[6] the filmmakers give us a brief glimpse at God’s email inbox, meant to be a visual representation of the prayers being uttered at any given moment.  We can see from the subject lines of the millions of emails that appear on the screen that the requests range from the simple—help me find my car keys before I’m late to this appointment, to the existential—help me survive my surgery, to the global—bring peace to our world.  The quick Hollywood gag underscores a complexity of western theology, though: human civilization has developed our conception of God according to our own perceived needs.  We’ve created what Rabbi Harold Kushner and others have referred to as a “three-legged stool.”[7]  We envision a God Who is omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent.  But when something goes wrong in the world—whether something of global impact, or something that upsets our personal sense of wellbeing—it may feel as though one or more of the legs of this stool is unstable.  At such moments, we may be inclined to shout at God.

In my imagination of how the “shouting at God” picture might unfold if it were a fully animated scene, and not just a still picture, here’s how I see it playing out:  the three figures shout in the direction of the sun, believing that they’re really letting God have a piece of their mind.  Maybe a crowd of a few dozen more join in, screaming at the top of their lungs like Howard Beale in Network, “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore!”[8]  In the midst of the cacophony, something like a hand taps one of the participants on the shoulder, and a voice says, “Hey, what are we yelling about?”  The person being addressed stops and explains, “We’re shouting at God!”  “Oh, OK,” the Being replies.  And God sits right down amongst the crowd and starts shouting along with them.

You see, I don’t think that God enjoys when bad things happen to good people.  I don’t think that God is happy when things go sideways—for a person, for a family, for a community, for a nation.  I think God is just as frustrated and sad and angry and emotional as the rest of us.  And God’s just happy—however enraged and unhinged we may be, however divorced from rational theology we may find ourselves in that moment—to see us standing up and shouting and giving a darn about the state of the world.

We are called upon l’taken olam b’malchut Shaddai[9]—to bring about the repair and perfection of the world so that it can someday function according to God’s original plan.  In order to do that, we have to get our fingernails dirty.  We have to be willing to intervene when we experience injustices.  We have to be willing to shout.

“But why?” you may ask.  Why, if God is truly omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent, does God not have some magic laser beam to zap any miscreants the instant they set their designs on bringing harm and pain into this world?  It’s tempting, perhaps, to imagine such a utopia wherein all of the pains that we have devised to inflict upon one another could no longer exist.  But we’d also be forfeiting our free will.  As nice as it might be to live in an idyllic setting, confident in the notion that no evil could ever encroach, I recognize that we’d quickly grow restless from the monotony.  We’d have no urge toward competitiveness or industriousness, no incentives to ever accomplish anything.

A reading in Sha’arei Teshuvah, the previous iteration of the Reform movement’s machzor, posited:

If some messenger were to come to us with the offer that death should be overthrown, but with the one inseparable condition that birth should also cease; if the existing generation were given the chance to live forever, but on the clear understanding that never again would there be a child, or a youth, or first love, never again new persons with new hopes, new ideas, new achievements; ourselves for always and never any others—could the answer be in doubt?[10]

The price of humanity, the price of free will, is that there will be moments that make us sad, angry, frustrated, despondent.  There will be moments when we shout at God.

At such moments, it may feel as though we’re shouting into the void.  Why waste our breath yelling at the Divine, when it seems as though an answer is never forthcoming?  Is it the case, as the illustration suggests, that God is too cowardly to face the questions and criticisms of a disgruntled humanity?

Personally, I don’t believe that the perceived lack of response, or the inaction on matters that we have deemed to be of the utmost importance, represent cowardice or indifference or powerlessness on the part of the Divine.  Rather, I think we’re being called upon to engage with God in a powerful and relational way to try to rectify what is wrong in our world.

The Akedah narrative that we read this morning, the “Binding of Isaac” is a terrible and stark reminder of the expectation – dare I say, the requirement—that we interact with God.  We are told directly in the first verses of the text: “HaElohim nisa et-Avraham, God tested Abraham.”  This should have been a WTF moment.  Abraham—who, as I’ve said, was ready to offer a challenge to God on other matters of justice—blindly snaps to obedience when God asks him to sacrifice his son.  God must send an angel at the final possible moment to shake Abraham from his stupor and prevent him from harming Isaac.  In a clear moment when Abraham’s parental instincts should have overridden his religious fervor, Abraham fails.  While he has shown himself willing and capable of challenging God in other situations, here we see him proceeding unquestioningly with a task that we as readers readily understand to be unreasonable.

What are we to make of this?

Some of you have heard me mention in the past that Hebrew Union College teaches students in homiletics classes not to “preach against the text.”  That is to say, we learn that we should not contradict the lessons of scripture.  But this becomes challenging when the message is, on its surface, so disturbing that it seems to beg us to have a visceral response.  It seems designed to provoke us to yell at Abraham, at God, at the world.

So maybe that’s exactly what we need to do—not to try to rationalize or justify Abraham’s actions, not to try to understand God’s rationale for issuing the awful command in the first place, but to simply acknowledge that sometimes stupefyingly maddening things happen in the world.  And when they do, it’s OK to push back, to resist, to scream.

Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch, a 19th century German rabbi, traveled to Switzerland fairly late in life.  According to legend, when he was asked why he would undertake the arduous journey at such an advanced age, he replied, “When I shall stand before God, the Eternal One will ask me with pride: ‘Did you see My Alps?’”[11]  Hirsch was emphasizing the notion that God wants us to take notice of the beauty and wonder of creation.  I think we can extrapolate from his example.  It’s not that we need to drop everything and jet off to Geneva or Zurich—if you’ve had that experience, I do hope you enjoyed it, but we do have to recognize that that’s not an attainable goal for everyone.  Rather, we should strive, wherever we are, to interact with the world and be moved or inspired by it in some way.  And if that way involves screaming our heads off at the messiness of the universe, so be it.  The only thing we’re not permitted to be, is indifferent.

That’s precisely the point of these Days of Awe.  On Yom Kippur, our Haftarah will be drawn from the teachings of the prophet Isaiah.  He exhorted the Jews of his time, “Cry with full throat, without restraint; raise your voice like a ram’s horn.”[12]

In his day, Isaiah wasn’t shouting at God, but at his fellow Israelites who he felt were going through the motions of false piety without actually taking actions to care for their neighbors or for the world around them.  Like the figures in the illustration we’ve been contemplating, they cried out to God for help, intervention, and relief of the world’s troubles while failing to acknowledge that they held in their own hands many of the tools needed to mitigate or solve their problems.

Perhaps we would do well to contrast this to our patriarch Jacob several generations earlier.  Jacob has spent much of his early life being somewhat of a heel (living up to the etymology of his given name).  Having alienated his brother by tricking him out of his birthright, he is now on the run from Esau, who has threatened fratricide.  All alone, he finds himself in the midst of the wilderness, where he falls asleep and has a dream of angels ascending and descending a ladder.  When he awakes, he proclaims, “Achein yesh Adonai bamakom ha-zeh va’anochi lo yadati—Surely God was in this place and I did not know!” The realization and reassurance that God is (and has been) with him gives him the wherewithal to carry on.  

Here’s what I think we can learn from Jacob: we are not alone in this.  There will be times when the world absolutely feels like a flaming garbage heap.  We’ll scream and cry and rant and rave at one another, and at God.  And that’s great, so long as it stirs us and spurs us to action. 

We pray that we may always be part of the cure and never the disease; that we may always strive to do good and to be good, so that we keep far from doing evil or being evil; and that we may learn to think before acting and to process before reacting so that we might judge with truth, decide with balance, and interact with wisdom.[13] 

It may well be that this Rosh Hashanah day presents us with a beautiful and appropriate day to yell at God.  Yet when we’ve come down from our red-faced ranting, let’s roll up our sleeves, open our hearts, and do the work needed to stand by God’s side, pick up the pieces of our broken world, and begin the challenging, but lo


[1] Condon, Sarah.  “It’s a Beautiful Day to Yell at God.”  Mockingbird.  Published online October 23, 2025.  Retrieved from https://mbird.com/suffering/its-a-beautiful-day-to-yell-at-god/?fbclid=IwY2xjawTCBMxleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFodmVuVExYbGVjcjZTSGZWc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHulJDh9af3Og0IrM7LAoeg0M6W7bUcZs8ZNFLwZxS4byw_r-Gi_vVSbrnUT-_aem_iERvdeKPlzUcF-hc01cJmQ#comment-section July 13, 2026.  Original source of image unknown.

[2] I am not certain whether he coined the term himself or adapted it from elsewhere.

[3] See Genesis 6:9

[4] See Genesis 18

[5] Genesis 18:25

[6] Shadyac, Tom, dir. Bruce Almighty. 2003; United States: Universal Pictures.

[7] For one source, see Kushner, Harold S. When Bad Things Happen to Good People. New York: Schocken Books, 1981.

[8] Network. Directed by Sidney Lumet, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer / United Artists, 1976.

[9] See, for instance, the prayer Aleinu l’shabeach… in the traditional liturgy

[10] Stern, Chaim, ed. Gates of Repentance (New York: Central Conference of American Rabbis, 1973).  The meditation is adapted from the writings of Viscount Herbert Louis Samuel.

[11] Cited in Goldmann, A.J. “Excuse Me, Have You Seen My Alps?” The Forward June 24, 2009.  Retrieved from https://forward.com/culture/108426/excuse-me-have-you-seen-my-alps/ August 24, 2026

[12] Isaiah 58:1

 

[13] Thank you to Rabbi Ray Zwerin for suggesting the wording of this beautiful prayer.