Friday, October 25, 2019

Introducing #Torahsong/ Closer to Fine- Bereisheet

Welcome!

For 5780, I’m working on a different look at Torah.  Inspired by a concept put forth by my friend and classmate Rabbi Eric Goldberg, I’m introducing #Torahsong.  Each week, I hope to post a pop song that (to me) has some connection to make us think about the weekly parsha.  You’ll get some insights into my (sometimes strange or eclectic) musical tastes, and hopefully learn something about the parsha as well.  There might even be a pun thrown in for good measure.

Please note, I do not own-- nor do I claim to own-- these songs.  Copyrights are held by the various artists.  I include them here for illustrative purposes.

Closer to Fine (Bereisheet- Genesis 1:1 to 6:8)
Music and lyrics by Amy Saliers, from the album "Indigo Girls" (Epic, 1989)


Parashat Bereisheet contains many stories, beginning with the narrative of the creation of the world.  In the day-by-day account of God's work in creation, God reviews the sum of each day's work and pronounces it "good" (on the third day, God actually pronounces two things good: the division of land and sea, and the creation of vegetation).  The exception comes with the creation of humanity.  God never declares that human beings are "good."  A madras (rabbinic story) later explains that this is because humans are not a finished creation.  We still must learn and adapt and grow in order to rise to our highest capacity and achieve our highest blessing.

Thus we strive to become ever-closer to God, to become closer to being worthy of called "good" (or at least, "fine," to engage in the calling l'taken slam b'malchut Shaddai, to work in partnership with God to perfect the world in the manner that God has envisioned.

What is the path toward achieving this goal?  Well, "There's more than one answer to these questions pointing me in a crooked line.  And the less I seek my source for some definitive the closer I am to fine."

Thursday, October 10, 2019

It Was Never About the Fish

It Was Never About the Fish
Yom Kippur Morning 5780
October 9, 2019
Rabbi Alan Cook
Sinai Temple, Champaign, Illinois

“So, what was it like?”

That’s the first thing they always say when they find out who I am.  “So, what was it like in the belly of the whale?”

How I respond sort of depends on how many times I’ve been asked the question that day—how much patience I can still muster.

If I’m up for it, I start off with a bit of what some might consider pedantry…

“First of all, it wasn’t a whale.  It was a dag gadol, a big fish.  In antiquity, no distinction was made between fish and whales, and when William Tyndale and other biblical translators started calling it a whale in the mid-16thcentury, the label stuck.”[1]

“OK, fine.  No need to get bogged down in semantics.  We can call it a fish if it makes you happy….But, you’re Jonah.  LiketheJonah!  Living inside a fish…holy mackerel!”

“Ha, ha.  Haven’t heard that one before.”  I try to remain calm and polite, though secretly I’m rolling my eyes.

“Stop being so modest…or are you just fishing for compliments?

“Can we just talk about something else?  Anything else?”

“But come on, really, how was it?  What did it smell like? How did you breathe?”

“I don’t really want to talk about…”

“Hey.  Sorry. I don’t mean to open a can of worms…ha ha.”

“Look, friend.  It’s not about the fish.  It was NEVERabout the fish.  The fish is what grabs your attention.  It pulls you into the story…”

“Oh, like you were pulled into the fish’s belly?”

“Yes.  I mean, no. I mean, not exactly.”

This is often when their eyes begin to glaze over.

“Listen,” I say.  “If it makes you feel better to think that I was literally inside a fish, that’s fine.  But that’s not what I’m about.  That’s not what my story’s about.”

It’s about then that they start backing away. I’m a real hit at cocktail parties.

But here’s the thing: if you’re reading my story for a tale of rugged survivalism and thrilling adventure on the high seas, you’ve missed the point.  The fish is a nice plot point, a convenient deus ex machinathat helps to fast-forward the evolution of my character from reluctant agent of God to faithful servant. By the time the rabbis who canonized the Tanach got their hands on my life story, it had been condensed into four fairly short chapters.  

To me, the truly interesting stuff, the real heart of the matter, comes in chapter four.  I say that only in retrospect, because chapter four of my book depicts a side of me that I’m not real proud of.  In it, I’m moody and glum, and I even have the chutzpahto talk back to God.  But that confrontation with God opens my eyes in a way that no big fish ever could have. You see, I’m sitting around sulking under the shade of a gourd plant.  God makes the plant wither and die, which only makes me more miserable. To add insult to injury—or so I interpreted it at the time—God gives me a scolding speech, asking me “Ha-heitiv charah lach?- Is it right for you to be angry?[2]”  God ends this castigation on the admonition that I should learn to care for cattle!

Care for cattle?  I’m shvitzingto death, I’m out of my gourd (and, quite literally, out of my gourd), and, yes, I’m angry!  Yet God wants me to worry about a bunch of cows?!

Well, in a word, Yes.

More than the people of Nineveh, more than any “giant fish” stories, God wanted me to think about the gourd and the cows. Small stuff, right?  Insignificant when compared to the socio-emotional capabilities of humans.  Worthy of only the most minor concern, particularly when measured against the vast complexities found in the rest of God’s creation.

That’s what I thought, too.  But then I realized that unless we pay attention to everythingaround us—the large andthe small, then we haven’t really been paying attention at all.  God wanted me to turn my anger away from my own well-being and show true righteous indignation about all of the problems plaguing our world.

It’s not about the fish.

As we all know, God thought my most significant role in life would be prophesying to the people of Nineveh.  I had the chutzpah to disagree, so now my legacy for eternity seems to be that I’m known as the giant fish guy.  That pains me, but to understand my side of the story, you’ve got to know what I knew about Nineveh.  They were a pretty bloodthirsty lot[3], but they feared God, and they weren’t dumb.[4]  To an individual, each Ninevite who saw me and heard my message was going to engage in some serious self-reflection and change his or her personal behavior.

But Nineveh was so broken, so divided, so full of anger and fear that even when they finally turned themselves around, it was still problematic.  They were just going through the motions; people were talking without speaking, people were hearing without listening, people were writing songs that voices never shared[5]…hey, that’s good stuff—I hope someone is writing this down!  Anyhow, people had forgotten how to meaningfully interact with and relate to one another.  While they might have made enough personal change to stave off God’s plan to destroy them, they still did not come together as a community.  

When I came through Nineveh and unspooled my prophecy, I got the reaction I anticipated.  The king freaked out and issued a decree that everyone should fast and put on sackcloth, and the population went for it, hook, line, and sinker…

Sorry, fish joke…comes with the territory.  But really, it’s not about the fish.

The people of Nineveh went through the motions—but did they show charity to the less fortunate in their community?  Did they care for the sick, or the widow, or the orphan?  “Ha-heitiv charah l’cha?  Is it right for you to be angry?”  Have you gotten angry in the proper fashion?

Some would say that if their repentance was good enough for God, it should be good enough for me.  But it was God who helped me learn to be sensitive about gourds and cattle and the seemingly small details.  God always wants to believe the best about people; God always wants to welcome people back into the fold.  So the bar’s set fairly low: pretty much the first effort someone makes toward teshuvah, God’s there with an outstretched arm[6]to say, “Welcome home, buddy!”  But just because the bar is set low doesn’t mean that we can’t take it upon ourselves to surpass that bar and do better.

When you’re out here every day like I am, tikkuningthe olam—that’s prophet lingo for the work we do trying to help change the world—you learn to recognize the difference between those who are really able to incorporate change into their routines, and those who are the likely recidivists—who, as soon as they think nobody is watching, are going to revert to the same old habits as before.
My colleague and contemporary, Isaiah[7]might even have been thinking of folks like the Ninevites when he said that the sorts of actions God desires of us are, “To unlock fetters of wickedness, And untie the cords of the yoke To let the oppressed go free; To break off every yoke. It is to share your bread with the hungry, And to take the wretched poor into your home; When you see the naked, to clothe them, And not to ignore your own kin.”[8]
True teshuvah, the kind that sticks, the kind that Isaiah says is most pleasing to God, must move beyond any “going-through-the-motions” for just a day, or week, or month at a time.  You have to be willing to make it impactful and lasting, to sincerely make an effort to re-align your moral compass.  And you need to have the ability to look beyond yourself and really explore how your behavior is impacting others.  That was what held back the Ninevites in their process.  
It’s challenging to be an active participant in this world.  If we only look out for number one, only concern ourselves with our own troubles and needs, then things seem a bit more manageable.  But that’s not really fulfilling the opportunity or obligation of human existence.  As I learned when I tried to flee to Tarshish, we’re all in the same boat.  And since, believe me, going overboard isn’t a great option, it behooves us each to grab an oar and weather the storm together.
It’s exhausting, to be sure.  It’s easy to develop outrage fatigue—wherein you get so tired of railing against all of the injustices in the world that you just want to give up.  Oftentimes, that’s accompanied by compassion fatigue—where you have difficulty caring about the world around you, because the magnitude of your own problems seems too enormous.
I’ve fallen victim to these two maladies myself, more often than I’d like to admit. It’s hard enough being a prophet; it’s even more difficult when you can’t seem to bring yourself to care about your neighbors and their troubles.  That’s why God made my gourd shrivel up.  That’s why God lectured me about cattle.  I needed the proverbial smack on the forehead to open my eyes and my heart – to make me stop whining “woe is me” and to stand up, take notice, and take action.  I needed to find the right kind of anger to guide my life.
Look, I don’t mean to project my experiences onto others, but my fellow prophet Elijah had a crisis of faith kind of similar to my own.  Instead of running away like me, though, Elijah chose to ask for a sign of God’s presence—some affirmation that his preaching a message that seemingly was falling on deaf ears was indeed a worthy venture.  And when Elijah tries to get these answers, the Divine voice questions him: “Mah l’cha, Eliyahu? What’s up, Elijah? What are you doing here?”[9]

Many people might read this exchange and think that God is asking, “Elijah, why did you come to this particular location? Why did you think that a cave near Mount Horeb is the best place to talk to Me?”

But those interpretations miss the mark.  Just as my story isn’t about the fish, Elijah’s story isn’t about the cave.  “Mah l’cha Eliyahu?” is a more existential question.  It’s similar to the question God was asking me when my gourd plant was taken away and when I was reminded about the cattle: “Ha-heitiv charah l’cha? Is it right for you to be angry?”  Why do you care? what is your purpose?  What will be your legacy?

In the eyes of many, I’ll probably always be the “fish guy.”  But hopefully Elijah, Isaiah, and I, along with the other prophets of Israel, also made a broader impact on the human psyche, inspiring people to care about the world in which we live, and the individuals – human, animal, or vegetable—that reside therein.
We all want to know that, at the end of our time here on this earth, our lives will be judged as having had meaning and purpose. Meaning is the internal question “Mah l’cha?—why am I here?”  Purpose is the external conversation we have with others—“Ha-heitiv charah l’cha?—what are you willing to get angry about?  What are you willing to help with?”[10]

For me, the key to answering these two questions was looking beyond my own ego, looking beyond my disdain for the Ninevites, and learning to care and get involved on behalf of the little things or little people in the world who don’t always have someone in their corner.  You may find yourself drawn to a different form of interaction with the world.  But if you read my story and get hung up on the fish, then you’re missing the opportunity to explore these key existential questions.

It’s not about the fish.

You don’t need to be a prophet to engage with God in making this world a better place.  Find your purpose.  Get angry about it.  Get involved. Make a difference.  And as you do so, may God find you worthy of being inscribed for goodness in the Book of Life, Blessing, and Peace.


[1]See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah  retrieved August 27, 2019.
[2]Jonah 4:4 (the phrase is repeated again in 4:9).  Translation following many contemporary biblical translations, including NIV and NKJV.
[3]The city of Nineveh also appears in the prophecy of Nahum, and is depicted in this manner.
[4]According to the commentary of Abraham ibn Ezra, who says the Ninevites would have immediately understood the serious of their sin upon seeing a prophet of God come into their community.
[5]“Sound of Silence,” by Paul Simon, from the Simon and Garfunkel album, Wednesday Morning, 3 A.M.
[6]A metaphor frequently cited in connection to God, the image of the outstretched hand (זרוע נטויה) first appears in Exodus 6:5.
[7]Scholars believe that both Jonah and Isaiah lived in the 8thcentury BCE.  There is much speculation that the latter portions of the book of Isaiah were written at a later date, but at least some of Isaiah’s prophecy is contemporaneous with Jonah’s.
[8]Isaiah 58:6-7.
[9]I Kings 19:9
[10]Inspired by a teaching from Rabbi Karen Kedar.

Kafka and the Doll

Kafka and the Doll
Kol Nidre 5780
October 8, 2019
Rabbi Alan Cook
Sinai Temple, Champaign, Illinois

A story—possibly apocryphal—is told about the author Franz Kafka.  One day, while walking in a park in Vienna, he encountered a young girl who was distraught because she had lost her doll.  Kafka offered to help her search, but they did not turn up the missing toy.  However, he promised his new friend that he would meet her the next day in the same location.

The next day Kafka returned with a typed letter that he read to the young girl. He told her that it was a message from her lost doll.  It said, “Please do not mourn me; I have gone on a trip to see the world.  I will write you of my adventures.”  The girl took comfort from the letter, and so Kafka continued to create ever more fanciful accounts of the doll’s travels, and he shared them with the girl regularly.

Eventually, the meetings came to an end and Kafka presented the girl with a new doll. This doll clearly looked different from the lost one, but all was explained with an attached letter that read, “My journeys have changed me.”[1]

As we mark a new year and reflect on our actions since last Yom Kippur, we too recognize that our travels have changed us.  The journeys we have taken in this past year, whether they involved far-flung itineraries or they were comprised of moments of physical and emotional shifts, have reshaped our sense of ourselves.  Now, these days of awe call us to reflect upon these changes: some have been joyful, some have been painful.  Some have emerged as welcome expressions of our best selves; some have proven hurtful and harmful, and stand to be lamented—and hopefully, corrected. Some changes represent an ongoing evolution: new skills and opportunities that continue to unfold before our eyes; some represent a closing of doors, an end to a particular chapter of our lives.  Whatever change we may have encountered in the past year, whatever change awaits us in the year just beginning to unfold, we pray that, through the grace of God, we may meet these changes and challenges with strength, courage, and integrity.

Kafka, of course had given much thought to the theme of human transformation and growth.  His 1915 novella, The Metamorphosis, follows Gregor Samsa through a monstrous transformation with which the protagonist is ultimately unable to fully cope. For us, the shifts we make are generally less dramatic; sometimes we may require feedback from family or friends before we fully understand the scope and beauty of our makeover.

A maxim currently making its way through the internet reminds us, “Butterflies cannot see their wings.  They can’t see how beautiful they are, but everyone else can.  People are like that, too.”[2]  Caterpillars go through tremendous effort to build a cocoon and make the transformation to a butterfly.  Some innate species-specific memory tells them that this is a worthwhile endeavor. But when they emerge, they cannot recognize that they have changed; they are unable to understand the full scope of their evolution.  So it is with us.  Oftentimes, until or unless someone else remarks on our transformation, be it external: “I like your new haircut” or internal: “you seem much happier lately,” we fail to fully internalize and appreciate how much we have truly changed.

According to Jewish tradition, true teshuvah, true change in our character that brings us in closer alignment with God’s expectations of us, cannot be achieved unless we engage with others with whom we have interacted over the course of the year and make amends for any way in which we have hurt them, whether purposely or accidentally.[3]  In this manner, Jewish tradition recognizes the power of interpersonal relations; our “travels have changed us” because on our journey through the past year we’ve taken the time to engage with others.  Some of our encounters have been richly rewarding; others have been hurtful or disappointing; all have left a mark on our persona.  Some of these impacts are nearly imperceptible, others are life-altering, but the enduring lesson is that since we do not move through life in a vacuum, we are ever-evolving creatures, shaped by our interactions with others.  

At this season of introspection, we are called to examine how we conduct ourselves in relationship with others.  Have we been cold or sharp or aloof toward those with whom we interact—be they friend, family, or stranger?  Or have we pushed ourselves to be fully open to the ways that each individual may bless our lives?

Once upon a time, in a remote corner of a European village lay decaying monastery with only five remaining monks.   It was clear that their religious order had seen better days.  In the woods nearby the monastery, there was a little hut that a Rabbi from a nearby town used from time to time. The monks always knew the Rabbi was home when they saw the smoke from his fire rise above the tree tops. As the Abbot agonized over the imminent demise of the monastery, it occurred to him to ask the Rabbi if he could offer any advice that might help him avoid the fate that seemed so inevitable.

The Rabbi welcomed the Abbot at his hut. When the Abbot explained the reason for his visit, the Rabbi had scant advice to offer.  “The only thing I can tell you,” said the Rabbi, “is that the Messiah is among you.”

When the Abbot returned to the monastery, his fellow monks gathered around him and asked, “What did the Rabbi say?” 

“He didn’t offer any concrete advice,” the Abbot admitted. “The only thing he did say, as I was leaving, was that the Messiah is among us. But I don’t know exactly what these words mean.”

In the months that followed, the monks thought about the significance of the Rabbi’s words: The Messiah is among us?  Could he possibly have meant that the Messiah is one of us monks here at the monastery?  If that’s the case, which one of us is the Messiah?  Do you suppose he meant the Abbot?  Yes, if he meant anyone, he probably meant Father Abbot.  Certainly, he could not have meant Brother Elred!  Elred gets crotchety at times.  But come to think of it, even so, Elred is almost always right. Maybe the rabbi did mean Brother Elred.  Of course, the Rabbi didn’t mean me.  He couldn’t possibly have meant me.  I’m just an ordinary person.  Yet supposing he did? Suppose I am the Messiah?

As they thought more about what the rabbi had said, the monks began to treat each other with great respect on the off chance that one among them might be the Messiah.   At the same time, each monk began to treat himself with great respect.

It so happened that even in its decline people still occasionally came to visit the beautiful forest and the monastery. Now, visitors began to sense a powerful spiritual aura. They were sensing the respect that now filled the monastery.  Though they didn’t really understand why, people began to come to the monastery even more frequently to picnic, to play, and to pray. They began to bring their friends, and their friends brought their friends.  Then some of the younger men who came to visit the monastery started to talk with the older monks.  After a while, one asked if he could join them.  Then, others asked if they too could join the abbot and older monks.  Within a few years, the monastery once again became a thriving order, a vibrant center of light and spirituality in the community.[4]

Like the monks in this parable, we have the opportunity to see our neighbors—and ourselves—as something greater than the immediate impression we may give to the casual observer.  Whether we embrace the notion of an individual Messiah, or whether we see individuals or ourselves as possible catalysts of a messianic age, our behavior toward others can and should be guided by the understanding that each person has importance and worth, even if it is not readily evident.  Judaism holds dear the notion that we are all created btzelem Elohim, in the Divine image.  When we strive to recognize and celebrate the good and the Godly within everyone whom we encounter—as the monks in the story began to do—we find, like the doll in Kafka’s story, that this sort of compassionate journey may change us for the better.

And being so changed, being so attuned to the Divine spark in others, may in turn inspire us to make changes to the manner in which we welcome and appreciate God in the world and in our lives.  Whether you find yourself to be “religious” or not, whether or not a consciousness of God’s expectations for you informs your day-to-day behavior, each of us arguably derives some benefit, some comfort, some sense of our place in the world by acknowledging the presence of a power higher than ourselves. For many of us, what we call this Power, and how we choose to interact with this Power, remains in flux.  We may rejoice and embrace God when we feel blessed; we may be inclined to shun God or feel angry when tragedy befalls us.  But Jewish tradition assures us that as much as our feelings about God may shift from moment-to-moment, God stands steadfast and immutable.

The Yiddish poet Aharon Zeitlin reminds us that God does not mind how we interact, so long as we care enough to engage with the Divine in some manner.

Praise me, says God, and I will know that you love me.
Curse me, says God, and I will know that you love me.
Praise me or curse me
And I will know that you love me.

Sing out my graces, says God,
Raise your fist against me and revile, says God.
Sing out graces or revile,
Reviling is also a kind of praise,
says God.

But if you sit fenced off in your apathy,
says God,
If you sit entrenched in: "I don't give a hang," says God,
If you look at the stars and yawn,
If you see suffering and don't cry out,
If you don't praise and you don't revile,
Then I created you in vain, says God.[5]

At this season, we invoke God as Avinu Malkeinu, a parent and a ruler.  This phrase is meant to juxtapose two qualities of God: mercy and lovingkindness stand side by side with firmness and justice. As we pray that God will be able to find balance in these qualities, so too do we strive to achieve a similar balance within ourselves.  As Zeitlin writes, God wants us, as representatives of humanity, to make our presence in this world worthwhile—to be changed by our journey.

Doing so requires not only that we examine our interactions with others and our relationship to the Divine; we also must take a close look at ourselves. As we engage in the challenging but rewarding work of teshuvah, we find our tradition encouraging us to engage in the act of cheshbon ha-nefesh, an “accounting of the soul.” As I go through this self-reflection process, I examine myself in the mirror.  I seek to look beyond the few extra pounds, the few fewer hairs, the few new sags and wrinkles. What I should really be looking for in the mirror, what Ishould really be focused on is not the superficial image, but my inner self.  I ask myself: in what ways did I change in 5779?  -- what new skill did I acquire, did I kick that bad habit, discover a new interest, form different attitudes, or champion new causes?  Did I pay attention to a social injustice, did I try to make a positive difference in my community, did I tell a dear one that I loved him or her, was I generous or stingy in my praise or in my rebuke?  Did I have the opportunity to celebrate an auspicious milestone or enjoy the flowering of new or rekindled love?  Did I grapple with disappointment or the pain of loss?  

We are all invited to engage in similar introspection.  Having undergone such an assessment, our tradition then encourages us to act upon these self-discoveries in an effort to shift our destinies in a positive manner.  Whatever our experiences, we recognize that we are not static creatures, standing stoic and unchanged as the seasons march on.  Rather, we are participants in the constant current of time, evolving with each passing moment.  We only hope that we are aware enough of our surroundings to steer ourselves toward positive changes.

Billy walked into the five-and-dime store (remember those?) and went to use the payphone (remember those?).  The clerk at the counter could not help but overhear the conversation.

“Hello, Dr. Silverberg?  I was wondering if you’d like to hire a boy to mow your lawn twice a week and maybe run some errands for you?  Oh, you already have somebody?  Are you satisfied with him?  You are? OK, thank you!  Goodbye.”

As Billy started to leave the store, the clerk stopped him and said, “Listen, if you’re looking for a job, they are hiring here.”

“Thank you, ma’am,” Billy replied, “But I already have a job.”

“But didn’t I hear you asking Dr. Silverberg if you he needed somebody to work for him?”

“Well not exactly,” Billy answered.  “You see, I’m the boy who works for Dr. Silverberg, and I was just checking up on myself.”

From time-to-time we need to check up on ourselves.  We need to honestly examine our thoughts, our deeds, and our words of the past year—for when we recognize our propensity for change and devote ourselves wholeheartedly to it, we begin to delve into the full range of possibilities and obligations associated with teshuvah.  And we may find that this journey of self-reflection has changed us for the better.

We pray that this year of 5780 will be a good, meaningful year filled with blessing for us all.  And when we return to this place next year to gather again for these Days of Awe may we each be able to say that we have been on a marvelous journey, and that we have changed in many positive ways.



[1]Many versions of this story exist.  This account is paraphrased from a telling by May Benatar called “Kafka and the Doll: The Pervasiveness of Loss,” posted on Huffington Post on October 3, 2011.  Retrieved July 23, 2019 from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kafka-and-the-doll_b_981348
[2]This quote is found in many places on the internet.  Its origin is unclear.
[3]A precept taught in Mishnah Yoma 8:9.
[4]Adapted from Peck, M. Scott. The Different Drum: Community Making and Peace.(New York: Touchstone, 1998)
[5]“If You Look at the Stars and Yawn,” by Aharon Zeitlin, trans. Emanuel Goldsmith

When They See Us

When They See Us
Rosh HaShanah AM 2019
Sept. 30/ Oct. 1, 2019
Sinai Temple, Chamapign, IL
Rabbi Alan Cook

The young man lamented to his mother, “I feel like everybody in the world hates me.”
His mother replied, her heart breaking, “I know it feels like that.  But I love you enough to make up for everybody.  Don’t ever think you’re alone.”[1]

Surely any of us who have children in our lives can empathize with this mother’s statement.  We want the young people for whom we care to be nurtured and protected; we want them to have every possible chance to realize their potential without these prospects being marred by societal ills and pressures.  For some young people, they are fortunate that they do experience their formative years as a time of opportunity, with numerous exciting options laid at their feet.  Others face an uphill climb every day.

In my opinion, the haunting narrative known as the Akedah, which we explore each Rosh Hashanah morning [on this Second Day of Rosh Hashanah each year], has something to say about this phenomenon. This Torah text seeks not only to further the narrative of Isaac by preventing his sacrifice; it also serves as an explicit instruction for the Jewish community—and arguably, for all adherents of Abrahamic traditions—throughout the ages.  Marking a clear distinction from other ancient near eastern tribes among whom the biblical Israelites would have dwelt, our religion pointedly did not require child sacrifices to signify our fealty to God.  We are familiar with the climax of the story, wherein an angel stays Abraham’s hand and proclaims, “Al tishlach yad’cha el ha-na’ar v’al ta’as lo m’umah—do not raise your hand against the child, and do nothing to cause harm.”[2]This historically has been seen not only to proscribe Abraham against hurting Isaac, but also to warn all parents and caregivers who may encounter this tale against harming children.  Moreover, it cautions us against permitting outside forces to diminish or destroy our children.  And what we seek for our own children, we must pursue for all of the children of the world with an equivalent passion.

In spite of this ideal, we know that in our nation—let alone throughout the world—there are “haves” and “have-nots,” and this societal striation can acutely impact our children.  If the story of theAkedahis to be an effective tool for shaping how we treat children, then its lessons must be appreciated and applied universally.  Rabbi Sandy Eisenberg Sasso composed a blessing that has become popular at many Jewish naming ceremonies for infants.  It begins, “What I wish for my child, I wish for all our children.”[3]  As we go about our daily business, as we take moral and ethical stances, as we enact public policies, the moral lessons of the Akedahimplore us to behave in a manner that will bless all children, to wish for our own offspring what we wish for others’ children.  As we hear the teachings of this passage as an enduring drumbeat each year at this season (and again in a few weeks, when the story appears in its regular place in the lectionary cycle), we must recognize that its message is imploring us: do not turn your backs on children; do not sacrifice them to be ignored and neglected.  Even if young people are not of your own flesh and blood, do not act indifferently toward their suffering.

Some will argue that the issues and concerns that I am about to discuss are political in nature and are out of place in a synagogue setting.  On the contrary, I believe that our Torah gives us clear moral guidelines that we must intervene when we have the power to prevent our neighbors from falling victim to injury or catastrophe.  Judaism’s prophetic call to acts of tikkun olam—working in partnership with God to improve the world—requires that we engage with such issues.

The young man whom I quoted a few moments ago at the outset of my remarks is named Antron McCray.  He is one of five young men who came to be known as the Central Park Five.  In 1989, Antron and four other African-American boys, ranging in age from fourteen to sixteen, were convicted of the rape and attempted murder of a jogger in Central Park.  All five men insisted that they were innocent and that their confessions had been coerced. In 2002, their sentences were vacated as another individual confessed to the crimes.  Earlier this year, director Ava DuVernay released a film, “When They See Us,” that explores the trial and its aftermath.

Antron and his fellow defendants spent thirteen years incarcerated for a crime that evidence shows they did not commit. While their peers were enjoying high school and college, and exploring the heady freedoms of young adulthood, Antron and Raymond and Korey and Yusuf and Kevin found themselves discarded and written off by society.  They had been sacrificed to a system that was more eager for the “win” of a conviction than it was interested in the truth.

Of course, much about the criminal justice system has changed in the ensuing years—mostly for the better.  But we can and must continue to address systemic inequities that continue to be seen in many corners of our society.  

Brian Stevenson, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, notes, “The Bureau of Justice now predicts that 1 in 3 black male babies born in the United States is expected to go to prison during their lifetime. That was not true in the 19thor 20thcenturies, but has come true in the 21stcentury.”[4]  To be sure, this statistic reflects not only issues in the justice system but also societal realities that shape and constrict opportunities for African Americans, Latinx, and other individuals of color in such a manner that criminal activity often comes to be seen as a passport out of the cycle of poverty and oppression.  It is long past time that Americans recognized that we are all in this together; when any segment of society is viewed as “less than” or “other”—or when they come to view themselves in this fashion, then we consign the children of that generation to despair.  We sacrifice these children by depriving them of hope for a brighter future for themselves and their families.  And we do so at our great peril.

Disrupting such a cycle requires that we move beyond the passive call of our Torah portion to “do no harm.”  We are also called to work actively to create hope and opportunity. As the late Senator Paul Wellstone reminded us, “We all do better when we all do better.”[5]  When we insist that all individuals in our community be given the same chance to learn and to grow, and to thrive, and to fulfill their highest potential, then we have truly protected all of our children.

We owe such protection not only to the children born into our communities; we should strive to afford similar protections to those whose parents have come here seeking political asylum in search of a better life for their families.  Certainly the issue of immigration is an emotionally fraught one, with a myriad of complexities.  But all of us—unless we are descended from indigenous American tribes—have an immigration story, whether our ancestors arrived on these shores freely or under duress. Countless generations of immigrants came to this country in pursuit of the American dream, and contributed to the fabric of this great nation.  

Lady Liberty continues to “lift [her] lamp beside the golden door,”[6]extending her welcome to those who come to the United States seeking a fresh start.  Indeed, their right to seek asylum is protected under international law.[7]  But beyond the legal responsibility, as Jews we should recognize the moral responsibility we have to provide sanctuary and welcome to those fleeing persecution. Our late rabbi, Isaac Neuman, often taught that the most significant verse in the Torah was, “There shall be one standard of law for you and for the stranger who resides among you.”[8]  The Torah repeats this sentiment no fewer than 36 times, reminding us to affirm our ancestral history of having been slaves in the land of Mitzrayim. Having known oppression, it is incumbent upon us to embrace another who finds himself or herself in similar situations. Al ta’as lo m’umah- do not let any harm befall him (or her).

Reasonable people may differ on immigration policy; we may debate about the number of immigrants that the United States can reasonably and responsibly absorb, or the appropriate way to vet individuals who wish to establish a new home in this country.  But I believe that in parsing such policy differences, we must never lose sight of the basic dignity that should be afforded to every single human being, regardless of his or her station in life.  We have failed as a society if we cannot recognize and lift up the innate humanity of each individual.  Turning individuals—asylum seekers and potential immigrants—into political pawns, separating children from their parents, denying them bathing facilities and basic dental hygiene and immunizations against the flu and judicial due process not only demeans and demoralizes them, it diminishes us all as a society.  The lessons of the Torah exhort us to bring compassion to the forefront in all of our policies and all of our interactions.  Al ta’as lo m’umah, do not bring harm to another person.

If we truly wish to have a conversation about how we are harming young people in this country and robbing them of the opportunity to grow up in safety and security, then we must include a discussion of our nation’s fetishization of guns.  While authorities differ on how to define a “mass shooting,” one standard defines it as an incident in which more than four individuals are killed or injured. By this standard, more than 270 incidents had taken place from January through August of this year alone.  That averages to more than one such incident per day in this country.[9]  Retailers are now offering bullet-proof backpacks for students; new school buildings are designed with S-shaped curves rather than straight hallways in order to impede a potential shooter’s progress; children as young as preschoolers and kindergarteners regularly participate in active shooter drills. While such methods may indeed reduce casualties when – God-forbid—a shooting occurs in a school setting, the true reasons they have been adopted is that such band-aid solutions are more palatable to politicians and policy-makers than doing the hard work of confronting our nation’s obsession with firearms.  Leaders at local, state, and national  levels time and again have refused to bring forward sensible gun control following mass shootings, tacitly sending the message that possession of firearms is of greater importance than the lives of American citizens—even our children.  Personally, I am not advocating for the elimination of all guns, but for the closure of loopholes and the implementation of safety measures that can lead our country toward far fewer gun fatalities.  If we fail to even explore such possibilities, we are complicit in standing idle while our neighbors bleed.  Al ta’as lo m’umah—do not allow harm to befall any individual, when you have the power to prevent it.

Following World War II, German Lutheran pastor Martin Niemöller, who had survived internment in Sachshausen and Dachau, wrote:

       First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
        Because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.[10]

At this season in which our tradition calls us to engage in self-examination, to explore our values and our behaviors and our very place within this world, Niemöller’s words should resonate with us. Will we stand with our friends and neighbors when others rise against them?  Will we demand, in the voice of the angel from today’s parasha, “Al ta’as lo m’umah!—do no harm to that person?”  Or will we remain mute in the face of atrocities committed against others, standing idle as our neighbors—and neighborhoods—bleed?[11]

Our Haftarah this morning tells the story of Hannah, who prayed so fervently for a child that only her lips moved as her heart poured out its inmost supplications.[12]  Would that we could direct our hopes, prayers, and aspirations to allthe children of the world with equal devotion.  Would that we cared enough about the future of every child that we would work with every fiber of our beings to shift our societal paradigms and ensure that no child would fall through the cracks of poverty and despair.

Al tishlach yad’cha el ha-na’ar v’al ta’as lo m’umah—do not raise your hand against the child, and do nothing to cause harm.”  For the sake of the future of our children and of all humankind, let us do our utmost to heed these important words of Torah.  Let us continue to strive for the day when all the young people of the world know lives replete with dignity, and love, and opportunity.


[1]From the Netflix series “When They See Us,” written by Ava DuVernay, Julian Breece, Robin Swicord, Attica Locke, and Michael Starrbury.
[2]Genesis 22:12
[3]Found, for example, at https://www.jewbelong.com/lifecycle/bris/bris-readings/wish-child-wish-children/Retrieved July 25, 2019.  The original text of Sasso’s prayer read, “my daughter” instead of “my child.”
[4]Address by Brian Stevenson to the annual convention of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, Cincinnati, Ohio, April 2, 2019.
[5]From a 1999 speech to the Sheet Metal Worker’s union.
[6]From “The New Colossus,” by Emma Lazarus, inscribed at the base of the Statue of Liberty.
[7]The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) states, “Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.”  This has been subsequently ratified in other international agreements.
[8]Numbers 15:16
[9]https://www.gunviolencearchive.orgRetrieved August 29, 2019
[10]Many versions of this quote exist on the internet; this appears to be Niemöller’s original text.
[11]A paraphrase of the negative commandment in Leviticus 19:16: “Do not stand idly by as your neighbor’s blood is shed.”
[12]See 1 Samuel, Chapter 1.