Thursday, December 26, 2019

Miketz: Iris


I've long found Parashat Miketz to be an intriguing portion.  Sure, it was my Bar Mitzvah portion, but even before that, this climactic moment in Joseph's life was interesting to me.  Heck, Andrew Lloyd Webber built a musical around it.

I picture Joseph undergoing a tremendous internal struggle: the position and status he has attained in Egypt would seem to require him to repudiate his past, yet here are his brothers pleading for their very survival (and telling him that his father's life may also hinge on his actions).  Will he reject them altogether?  Will he help them, simply in his capacity as Egypt's second-in-command, without ever attempting a reconciliation?  Or will he let his guard down and reveal his true identity to his siblings and his Egyptian peers (and subjects)?  The true answer does not come until next week's portion, but thanks to the Torah's omniscient narration we can begin to understand what Joseph is dealing with.

I imagine that Joseph is experiencing a certain degree of what we now refer to as "impostor syndrome," in that he cannot expose his true self to any of the important people in his life.  He is torn between two worlds.  In his family of origin, his dreams and aspirations have been misunderstood and have served as a source of tension.  Pharaoh and the Egyptian court, let alone the average Egyptian citizens, may never fully appreciate Joseph's identity as a proto-Israelite.  He has adopted Egyptian dress and culture, but his heart and mind are still connected to his roots.

When I began thinking of possible songs for this parasha, I kept coming back to the chorus of Goo Goo Dolls' "Iris."  Though Johnny Rzeznik has given other personal explanations for the lyrics, and certainly there's some thematic links to the movie "City of Angels," where this song debuted on the soundtrack, I cannot help but think that there's a bit of Joseph's dilemma that's underscored by the lyrics: "I don't want the world to see me/ 'Cause I don't think that they'd understand."


Please note, I do not own-- nor do I claim to own-- these songs.  Copyrights are held by the various artists.  I include them here for illustrative purposes.
Iris- (Miketz, Genesis 41:1-44:17)
Music and lyrics by John Rzeznik, performed by Goo Goo Dolls.  From the "City of Angels" soundtrack, Warner Bros., 1998.




Wednesday, December 18, 2019

VaYeshev: Hold Fast to Dreams

Parashat VaYeshev finds Jacob finally settling down for a bit.  VaYeshev literally means, "and he dwelled." But just as soon as we are told that Jacob has established his household, we also learn of family tensions, consistent with the drama we have seen throughout Genesis.  In this case it is seventeen-year-old Joseph who has aroused the ire and jealousy of his half-brothers.

Joseph's chief crime/ annoying trait, as far as his brothers are concerned, is that he is literally and figuratively a dreamer.  He has dreams, he talks incessantly about them, he believes that they will come true, and he seems to anticipate that the dreams foretell that he will attain a higher status in life than the rest of his family.  Of course, the latter idea does come to fruition, but neither Joseph and his brothers are conscious of what the future holds at this juncture.

So, as has often happened throughout our history to those with unpopular dreams, the brothers conspire in an effort to silence Joseph and divorce themselves from his annoying dreaming.  But their efforts actually set in motion a course of events that will ultimately help Joseph's dreams come to fruition.

The poet Langston Hughes wrote a poem called "Dreams" in the shadow of the 1960s Civil Rights Movement.  It declares, "Hold fast to dreams/ for if dreams die,/ life is a broken-winged bird/ that cannot fly. / Hold fast to dreams / for if dreams go / life is a barren field, / frozen with snow."  Hughes reminds us that life devoid of dreams is meaningless, and that we must continue to dream and imagine, even if the end goals of which we dream seem at first to be unattainable.

The Jewish musical group Kol B'Seder (Rabbi Daniel Freelander and Cantor Jeff Klepper) turned Hughes' poem into the chorus of a song (also adding some text from a Yiddish author who used the pen name "Yehoash"), which became popular within NFTY (the North American Federation of Temple Youth).  Like Hughes' poem, it reminds us to keep dreaming, to continue imagining a brighter future.

Please note, I do not own-- nor do I claim to own-- these songs.  Copyrights are held by the various artists.  I include them here for illustrative purposes.
Hold Fast to Dreams- (VaYeshev, Genesis 37:1-40:23)
Music and lyrics by Cantor Jeff Klepper and Rabbi Daniel Freelander, based on poetry by Langston Hughes and Yehoash.  Performed by Kol B'Seder.  The song appears on "Snapshots: The Best of Kol B'seder, Volume 1," which was released in 2004 and is the version heard here.  I have not been able to locate original album information.





Friday, December 13, 2019

VaYishlach: Stand

Parashat VaYishlach finds Jacob nervously preparing to reunite with his brother Esau.  After years of working for his father-in-law, Laban, Jacob's fortunes have changed, and perhaps his character has changed, as well.  But will Esau recognize his brother's growth?  Has Esau also grown and let go of the past grudges that drove a wedge between the brothers?  Is Jacob able to apologize for his apparent misappropriation of the birthright and blessing that Esau feels were rightfully his?

Uncertain of how this encounter will unfold, Jacob sends a delegation ahead to greet Esau.  Then he makes preparations to protect his family and his belongings; if Esau still harbors any ill-will toward him, Jacob wants any retaliation to be visited on him, not on his family.  At last, after all of this planning, Va'y'vater Ya'akov l'vado- Jacob was left alone.  He had only his own conscience and thoughts to keep him company.

Here we encounter the (in)famous wrestling match.  Precisely what takes place is purposely left cryptic by the Torah text, but Jacob appears to perceive that he has wrestled a Divine creature.  Jacob  refuses to release his opponent unless he receives a blessing from him, and the unknown assailant changes Jacob's name to Israel- one who wrestles with God.  Henceforth, Jacob will have to live up to this name by grappling with its multitude of meanings.  What will it mean for him to be a God-wrestler?  How will he think about his future direction?  How will he listen to reason?  How will he take a stand?

(Michael Stipe has said that this song was his response to "bubblegum pop," and he was trying to write nonsense lyrics, but to me they come together to paint an image of what Jacob is facing at this juncture)

Please note, I do not own-- nor do I claim to own-- these songs.  Copyrights are held by the various artists.  I include them here for illustrative purposes.

Stand- (VaYishlach, Genesis 32:4-36:43)
Music and lyrics by Bill Berry, Peter Buck, Mike Mills, and Michael Stipe.  Performed by R.E.M.  From the album, "Green" Warner Brothers Records, 1989.


Wednesday, December 4, 2019

VaYetzei: Have It All


Parashat VaYetzei kicks off with Jacob fleeing his parents' home to escape his brother's wrath.  In the middle of the desert, he stops to rest and has an awe-inspiring dream of angels ascending and descending a ladder.  Startled awake, he recognizes God's protective presence in his life, and forges a covenant of his own with God.  Jacob echoes the relationship his parents and grandparents had with the Divine, but also makes clear that he must construct his theology and his God-relationship on his own terms.

When Jews pray, they evoke the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (and, in egalitarian settings, the matriarchs Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, and Leah are also acknowledged).  We hope that we are blessed because of their merits, but we recognize that we also must encounter God in our own right, and live lives that are worthy of God's blessing.  Our tradition teaches that if we can do so whole-heartedly, God will indeed bless us abundantly.

God appears to Jacob in the midst of the wilderness when Jacob is experiencing one of the most vulnerable moments in his life (though there will be others to come).  It would seem that Jacob needs God at this point mores than God needs Jacob.  Nevertheless, God sees promise and potential in him, and promises him great things.

I feel this song captures the sense of the opportunities that lay in store for Jacob in the future.  If he keeps up his end of the covenant, and engages in behavior that is pleasing to God, he can "have it all."

Please note, I do not own-- nor do I claim to own-- these songs.  Copyrights are held by the various artists.  I include them here for illustrative purposes.

Have It All- (VaYetzei, Genesis 28:10-32:3)
Music and lyrics by Jason Mraz, David Hodges, Jacob Kasher Hindlin, Mona Tavakoli, Chaska Lela Potter, May Sunshine Bloomfield, and Emily Gebhardt.  Performed by Jason Mraz.  From the album, "Know." Atlantic Records, 2018.


Tuesday, November 26, 2019

Toldot: Worlds Apart


Parashat Toldot introduces us to the struggle between Jacob and his twin brother Esau.  Not only will the tensions of their actual relationship continue to reverberate in this section of the Genesis narrative; their sibling rivalry becomes an extended metaphor throughout history for struggles between Jews and other nations.  In the time of the Talmud, the rabbis heaped disdain upon Esau, and used him as a sort of proxy for venting their frustrations about Roman rule.  Some contemporary commentators have suggested that the conflict between Jacob and Esau we read about in Toldot presages the conflict between the modern state of Israel and her Arab neighbors.

The brothers, we are told, battled one another even in the womb.  The bartering of the birthright and the subsequent chicanery that allows Jacob to receive the blessing reserved for his brother only underscores this contentiousness.  Yet even in the midst of this drama, there are of course lessons for us to learn.

Esau cries out in anguish, after learning that his father has "mistakenly" blessed Jacob (how much of a mistake this truly was is, of course, the subject of much debate by biblical exegetes).  He asks, "Have you but one blessing, father?"

The answer to Esau's question, which the Torah treats as rhetorical, is an emphatic "no."  Each of us is capable and worthy of receiving our own blessings, tailor-made to our hopes, desires, talents, and needs.  Ultimately, I believe that Jacob received the blessing that would be most useful and meaningful for him, and Esau was granted what he needed.  The brothers would have done well to recognize that life is not a zero-sum game: we need not see others' opportunities diminished in order to enjoy the bounty of our own blessings.  This is a lesson we all can take to heart.

This is the first song I've selected that does not fit the genre of "rock/pop" music.  It's a song from the musical "Big River," a telling of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.  In it, Huck and Jim realize (as much as they can do so within the confines of a Broadway musical) that they have similarities and differences, and both are worthy of being celebrated

Please note, I do not own-- nor do I claim to own-- these songs.  Copyrights are held by the various artists.  I include them here for illustrative purposes.

Worlds Apart- (Toldot, Genesis 25:19-28:9)
Music and lyrics by Roger Miller.  From the musical "Big River."  Original cast recording featuring Daniel H. Jenkins and Ron Richardson.




Thursday, November 21, 2019

Chayei Sarah: Three Little Birds

As mentioned in the post for last week (Parashat VaYera), the relationship between Abraham and Isaac in Isaac's adulthood, following the "Binding of Isaac" episode, was apparently tense.  Add to the equation that this week's portion opens with the death of Sarah, and we recognize that even if father and son were on good terms, this event would have introduced many new emotions into the equation.

Nevertheless, in his mourning Abraham recognizes that there are still certain tasks that must be attended to.  In fact, the word for "to mourn for her [Sarah]" in the Torah is לבכתה- livchota.  The כ, or ch sound in the word is, according to Masoretic tradition, written smaller than the surrounding letters.  This led some rabbis to comment that Abraham diminished his mourning slightly in order to focus on these practical concerns. 

So Abraham negotiates a burial plot for Sarah, and then turns his attention to finding a suitable mate for Isaac, so that the family traditions can be carried forward, and so that Isaac can be comforted following the passing of his mother.  Rebekah fits both bills: she is part of the extended family, which will be of help in preserving what Abraham has built thus far; and she and Isaac are truly in love.  

I've chosen the Bob Marley song "Three Little Birds," because I think that ultimately this portion presents an optimism similar to what Marley's lyrics and melody embody.  As the portion ends, and the Abraham chapter of the narrative comes to a close (he dies near the end of this portion), Abraham is content in his belief that "every little thing gonna be all right."

Please note, I do not own-- nor do I claim to own-- these songs.  Copyrights are held by the various artists.  I include them here for illustrative purposes.

Three Little Birds- (Chayei Sarah, Genesis 23:1-25:18)
Music and lyrics by Bob Marley  From the album "Exodus," Tuff Gong Records, 1977.



Tuesday, November 12, 2019

VaYera: Father and Son

Parashat VaYera is perhaps best known for the haunting story known as Akedat Yitzchak, the Binding of Isaac, recounting how Abraham's son is nearly sacrificed so that Abraham can prove his fealty to God.  In the end, the sacrifice does not take place, but the relationship between Abraham and Isaac may nonetheless have been compromised irreparably: never again is there a record of a conversation between the two.

There are numerous tensions in this story: love of family vs. love of God, zeal for a cause, the desire to secure a legacy for oneself, and so forth.  These are further underscored by another narrative in this portion, which speaks of Abraham's son, Ishmael, and his mother, Hagar.  Due to tensions with Sarah, Hagar and Ishmael are thrown out of the household.  And just when the situation seems most precarious, an angel intervenes to rescue them.  The Torah notes that the angel has arrived because God has hearkened to Ishmael's cries ba'asher hu sham-- "as he is, there."  Commentators expand on this by noting that Ishmael was not made to conform to some other expectation of how he should be behaving or reacting; God was prepared to meet his needs just as he presented them.

Contrast this to Abraham's journey up the mountain with Isaac.  Twice the text tells us, vayelchu shneihem yachdav--"the two of them walked together."  Yet we can tell from the dynamic that though they are physically accompanying one another, they are growing ever further apart.

I think these tensions are beautifully expressed in Cat Stevens' song "Father and Son," which details both love and conflict in a parent-child relationship.  I think that's found in abundance in Abraham's relationship with his sons; I think it's present in the intergenerational interactions of most families: hopes and fears and ideals of the parent don't always translate for the child (and vice-versa).  "You will still be here tomorrow, but your dreams may not."

Please note, I do not own-- nor do I claim to own-- these songs.  Copyrights are held by the various artists.  I include them here for illustrative purposes.

Father and Son- (VaYera: Genesis 18:1-22:24)
Music and lyrics by Cat Stevens.  From the album "Tea for the Tillerman," A & M Records, 1970.




(As a side note, I came to this song somewhat late...in the summer of 1987, when I was 16, I went on my first trip to Israel with the Alexander Muss High School in Israel.  This (and a few other Cat Stevens pieces) were in heavy rotation on a mixtape we played on our bus.  I wonder if I was particularly primed to appreciate this song because of my age and context when I first learned it.)


Wednesday, November 6, 2019

Lech Lecha: Go Your Own Way

Perhaps the best-known song in contemporary Jewish music for Parashat Lech Lecha is the late Debbie Friedman's "Lechi Lach" which takes its inspiration from Abraham's journey, as described in this portion.  While Debbie Friedman was a gifted composer, I will admit that this has never been my favorite song from her catalog.  However, the first cantorial soloist with whom I worked, professionally, Angela Gold, was very fond of the song (and did a wonderful rendition of it).  Each year, we would have a "negotiation" as to whether we would sing the song when this portion came around.  Angela passed away, much too young, earlier this year.  I will forever think of her fondly when I think of this portion.

But Abraham's journey invites us to think about the journeys that each of us take.  By choosing to heed God's call, Abraham (at this point in the Torah, he's known as Abram) gives each of us, as his descendants, the permission and the challenge to embark on our journeys.  As we undergo travels and explorations in our lives-- some literal, some theological or emotional-- we have the opportunity to blaze new trails.  Nobody has encountered the world and its wonders in quite the same way that each of us, individually, will do so.  As you embark upon (or continue upon) your life's journey, you can do so with the permission that Abraham has secured for you to "Go Your Own Way."

Please note, I do not own-- nor do I claim to own-- these songs.  Copyrights are held by the various artists.  I include them here for illustrative purposes.

 Go Your Own Way- (Lech Lecha: Genesis 12:1-17:27)
Music and lyrics by Lindsay Buckingham; performed by Fleetwood Mac.  From the album "Rumors," Warner Brothers, 1977.



Noach- Who Put the Bomp (In the Bomp, Bomp, Bomp) #Torahsong

There's a great deal of material in Parashat Noach, and a great number of songs for which I could argue a connection (for instance, the Irish Rovers' 1868 recording of Shel Silverstein's "The Unicorn Song").  But it's easy to get caught up in the tale of Noah and the flood, and to forget some of the other stories and lessons that can be found in the text.  

One such passage is the Tower of Babel.  There have been a number of commentaries over the years exploring what exactly went wrong with this construction project.  One compelling explanation argues that the problems began before God confounded the peoples' language-- the participants in the building effort brought calamity upon themselves, because they failed to listen to one another, failed to be gracious to one another, failed to fully communicate with their neighbors.  It's a reminder to all of us not just to listen to those with whom we are in relationship, but to actively make an effort to hear and acknowledge them.

There are many songs with nonsense syllables or gibberish; this is not necessarily the best.  But it readily evokes the salient lesson of the Tower of Babel.  It also represents a sort of interesting place in music history, as the nonsense syllables it references come from actual songs in the Doo-Wop era, and it was itself parodied in later eras.

Please note, I do not own-- nor do I claim to own-- these songs.  Copyrights are held by the various artists.  I include them here for illustrative purposes.

 Who Put the Bomp (In the Bomp, Bomp, Bomp)- (Noach: Genesis 6:9-11:32)
Music and lyrics by Gerry Goffin and Barry Mann, performed by Barry Mann.  Recorded as a 7-inch single for ABC-Paramount, 1961.



Friday, October 25, 2019

Introducing #Torahsong/ Closer to Fine- Bereisheet

Welcome!

For 5780, I’m working on a different look at Torah.  Inspired by a concept put forth by my friend and classmate Rabbi Eric Goldberg, I’m introducing #Torahsong.  Each week, I hope to post a pop song that (to me) has some connection to make us think about the weekly parsha.  You’ll get some insights into my (sometimes strange or eclectic) musical tastes, and hopefully learn something about the parsha as well.  There might even be a pun thrown in for good measure.

Please note, I do not own-- nor do I claim to own-- these songs.  Copyrights are held by the various artists.  I include them here for illustrative purposes.

Closer to Fine (Bereisheet- Genesis 1:1 to 6:8)
Music and lyrics by Amy Saliers, from the album "Indigo Girls" (Epic, 1989)


Parashat Bereisheet contains many stories, beginning with the narrative of the creation of the world.  In the day-by-day account of God's work in creation, God reviews the sum of each day's work and pronounces it "good" (on the third day, God actually pronounces two things good: the division of land and sea, and the creation of vegetation).  The exception comes with the creation of humanity.  God never declares that human beings are "good."  A madras (rabbinic story) later explains that this is because humans are not a finished creation.  We still must learn and adapt and grow in order to rise to our highest capacity and achieve our highest blessing.

Thus we strive to become ever-closer to God, to become closer to being worthy of called "good" (or at least, "fine," to engage in the calling l'taken slam b'malchut Shaddai, to work in partnership with God to perfect the world in the manner that God has envisioned.

What is the path toward achieving this goal?  Well, "There's more than one answer to these questions pointing me in a crooked line.  And the less I seek my source for some definitive the closer I am to fine."

Thursday, October 10, 2019

It Was Never About the Fish

It Was Never About the Fish
Yom Kippur Morning 5780
October 9, 2019
Rabbi Alan Cook
Sinai Temple, Champaign, Illinois

“So, what was it like?”

That’s the first thing they always say when they find out who I am.  “So, what was it like in the belly of the whale?”

How I respond sort of depends on how many times I’ve been asked the question that day—how much patience I can still muster.

If I’m up for it, I start off with a bit of what some might consider pedantry…

“First of all, it wasn’t a whale.  It was a dag gadol, a big fish.  In antiquity, no distinction was made between fish and whales, and when William Tyndale and other biblical translators started calling it a whale in the mid-16thcentury, the label stuck.”[1]

“OK, fine.  No need to get bogged down in semantics.  We can call it a fish if it makes you happy….But, you’re Jonah.  LiketheJonah!  Living inside a fish…holy mackerel!”

“Ha, ha.  Haven’t heard that one before.”  I try to remain calm and polite, though secretly I’m rolling my eyes.

“Stop being so modest…or are you just fishing for compliments?

“Can we just talk about something else?  Anything else?”

“But come on, really, how was it?  What did it smell like? How did you breathe?”

“I don’t really want to talk about…”

“Hey.  Sorry. I don’t mean to open a can of worms…ha ha.”

“Look, friend.  It’s not about the fish.  It was NEVERabout the fish.  The fish is what grabs your attention.  It pulls you into the story…”

“Oh, like you were pulled into the fish’s belly?”

“Yes.  I mean, no. I mean, not exactly.”

This is often when their eyes begin to glaze over.

“Listen,” I say.  “If it makes you feel better to think that I was literally inside a fish, that’s fine.  But that’s not what I’m about.  That’s not what my story’s about.”

It’s about then that they start backing away. I’m a real hit at cocktail parties.

But here’s the thing: if you’re reading my story for a tale of rugged survivalism and thrilling adventure on the high seas, you’ve missed the point.  The fish is a nice plot point, a convenient deus ex machinathat helps to fast-forward the evolution of my character from reluctant agent of God to faithful servant. By the time the rabbis who canonized the Tanach got their hands on my life story, it had been condensed into four fairly short chapters.  

To me, the truly interesting stuff, the real heart of the matter, comes in chapter four.  I say that only in retrospect, because chapter four of my book depicts a side of me that I’m not real proud of.  In it, I’m moody and glum, and I even have the chutzpahto talk back to God.  But that confrontation with God opens my eyes in a way that no big fish ever could have. You see, I’m sitting around sulking under the shade of a gourd plant.  God makes the plant wither and die, which only makes me more miserable. To add insult to injury—or so I interpreted it at the time—God gives me a scolding speech, asking me “Ha-heitiv charah lach?- Is it right for you to be angry?[2]”  God ends this castigation on the admonition that I should learn to care for cattle!

Care for cattle?  I’m shvitzingto death, I’m out of my gourd (and, quite literally, out of my gourd), and, yes, I’m angry!  Yet God wants me to worry about a bunch of cows?!

Well, in a word, Yes.

More than the people of Nineveh, more than any “giant fish” stories, God wanted me to think about the gourd and the cows. Small stuff, right?  Insignificant when compared to the socio-emotional capabilities of humans.  Worthy of only the most minor concern, particularly when measured against the vast complexities found in the rest of God’s creation.

That’s what I thought, too.  But then I realized that unless we pay attention to everythingaround us—the large andthe small, then we haven’t really been paying attention at all.  God wanted me to turn my anger away from my own well-being and show true righteous indignation about all of the problems plaguing our world.

It’s not about the fish.

As we all know, God thought my most significant role in life would be prophesying to the people of Nineveh.  I had the chutzpah to disagree, so now my legacy for eternity seems to be that I’m known as the giant fish guy.  That pains me, but to understand my side of the story, you’ve got to know what I knew about Nineveh.  They were a pretty bloodthirsty lot[3], but they feared God, and they weren’t dumb.[4]  To an individual, each Ninevite who saw me and heard my message was going to engage in some serious self-reflection and change his or her personal behavior.

But Nineveh was so broken, so divided, so full of anger and fear that even when they finally turned themselves around, it was still problematic.  They were just going through the motions; people were talking without speaking, people were hearing without listening, people were writing songs that voices never shared[5]…hey, that’s good stuff—I hope someone is writing this down!  Anyhow, people had forgotten how to meaningfully interact with and relate to one another.  While they might have made enough personal change to stave off God’s plan to destroy them, they still did not come together as a community.  

When I came through Nineveh and unspooled my prophecy, I got the reaction I anticipated.  The king freaked out and issued a decree that everyone should fast and put on sackcloth, and the population went for it, hook, line, and sinker…

Sorry, fish joke…comes with the territory.  But really, it’s not about the fish.

The people of Nineveh went through the motions—but did they show charity to the less fortunate in their community?  Did they care for the sick, or the widow, or the orphan?  “Ha-heitiv charah l’cha?  Is it right for you to be angry?”  Have you gotten angry in the proper fashion?

Some would say that if their repentance was good enough for God, it should be good enough for me.  But it was God who helped me learn to be sensitive about gourds and cattle and the seemingly small details.  God always wants to believe the best about people; God always wants to welcome people back into the fold.  So the bar’s set fairly low: pretty much the first effort someone makes toward teshuvah, God’s there with an outstretched arm[6]to say, “Welcome home, buddy!”  But just because the bar is set low doesn’t mean that we can’t take it upon ourselves to surpass that bar and do better.

When you’re out here every day like I am, tikkuningthe olam—that’s prophet lingo for the work we do trying to help change the world—you learn to recognize the difference between those who are really able to incorporate change into their routines, and those who are the likely recidivists—who, as soon as they think nobody is watching, are going to revert to the same old habits as before.
My colleague and contemporary, Isaiah[7]might even have been thinking of folks like the Ninevites when he said that the sorts of actions God desires of us are, “To unlock fetters of wickedness, And untie the cords of the yoke To let the oppressed go free; To break off every yoke. It is to share your bread with the hungry, And to take the wretched poor into your home; When you see the naked, to clothe them, And not to ignore your own kin.”[8]
True teshuvah, the kind that sticks, the kind that Isaiah says is most pleasing to God, must move beyond any “going-through-the-motions” for just a day, or week, or month at a time.  You have to be willing to make it impactful and lasting, to sincerely make an effort to re-align your moral compass.  And you need to have the ability to look beyond yourself and really explore how your behavior is impacting others.  That was what held back the Ninevites in their process.  
It’s challenging to be an active participant in this world.  If we only look out for number one, only concern ourselves with our own troubles and needs, then things seem a bit more manageable.  But that’s not really fulfilling the opportunity or obligation of human existence.  As I learned when I tried to flee to Tarshish, we’re all in the same boat.  And since, believe me, going overboard isn’t a great option, it behooves us each to grab an oar and weather the storm together.
It’s exhausting, to be sure.  It’s easy to develop outrage fatigue—wherein you get so tired of railing against all of the injustices in the world that you just want to give up.  Oftentimes, that’s accompanied by compassion fatigue—where you have difficulty caring about the world around you, because the magnitude of your own problems seems too enormous.
I’ve fallen victim to these two maladies myself, more often than I’d like to admit. It’s hard enough being a prophet; it’s even more difficult when you can’t seem to bring yourself to care about your neighbors and their troubles.  That’s why God made my gourd shrivel up.  That’s why God lectured me about cattle.  I needed the proverbial smack on the forehead to open my eyes and my heart – to make me stop whining “woe is me” and to stand up, take notice, and take action.  I needed to find the right kind of anger to guide my life.
Look, I don’t mean to project my experiences onto others, but my fellow prophet Elijah had a crisis of faith kind of similar to my own.  Instead of running away like me, though, Elijah chose to ask for a sign of God’s presence—some affirmation that his preaching a message that seemingly was falling on deaf ears was indeed a worthy venture.  And when Elijah tries to get these answers, the Divine voice questions him: “Mah l’cha, Eliyahu? What’s up, Elijah? What are you doing here?”[9]

Many people might read this exchange and think that God is asking, “Elijah, why did you come to this particular location? Why did you think that a cave near Mount Horeb is the best place to talk to Me?”

But those interpretations miss the mark.  Just as my story isn’t about the fish, Elijah’s story isn’t about the cave.  “Mah l’cha Eliyahu?” is a more existential question.  It’s similar to the question God was asking me when my gourd plant was taken away and when I was reminded about the cattle: “Ha-heitiv charah l’cha? Is it right for you to be angry?”  Why do you care? what is your purpose?  What will be your legacy?

In the eyes of many, I’ll probably always be the “fish guy.”  But hopefully Elijah, Isaiah, and I, along with the other prophets of Israel, also made a broader impact on the human psyche, inspiring people to care about the world in which we live, and the individuals – human, animal, or vegetable—that reside therein.
We all want to know that, at the end of our time here on this earth, our lives will be judged as having had meaning and purpose. Meaning is the internal question “Mah l’cha?—why am I here?”  Purpose is the external conversation we have with others—“Ha-heitiv charah l’cha?—what are you willing to get angry about?  What are you willing to help with?”[10]

For me, the key to answering these two questions was looking beyond my own ego, looking beyond my disdain for the Ninevites, and learning to care and get involved on behalf of the little things or little people in the world who don’t always have someone in their corner.  You may find yourself drawn to a different form of interaction with the world.  But if you read my story and get hung up on the fish, then you’re missing the opportunity to explore these key existential questions.

It’s not about the fish.

You don’t need to be a prophet to engage with God in making this world a better place.  Find your purpose.  Get angry about it.  Get involved. Make a difference.  And as you do so, may God find you worthy of being inscribed for goodness in the Book of Life, Blessing, and Peace.


[1]See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah  retrieved August 27, 2019.
[2]Jonah 4:4 (the phrase is repeated again in 4:9).  Translation following many contemporary biblical translations, including NIV and NKJV.
[3]The city of Nineveh also appears in the prophecy of Nahum, and is depicted in this manner.
[4]According to the commentary of Abraham ibn Ezra, who says the Ninevites would have immediately understood the serious of their sin upon seeing a prophet of God come into their community.
[5]“Sound of Silence,” by Paul Simon, from the Simon and Garfunkel album, Wednesday Morning, 3 A.M.
[6]A metaphor frequently cited in connection to God, the image of the outstretched hand (זרוע נטויה) first appears in Exodus 6:5.
[7]Scholars believe that both Jonah and Isaiah lived in the 8thcentury BCE.  There is much speculation that the latter portions of the book of Isaiah were written at a later date, but at least some of Isaiah’s prophecy is contemporaneous with Jonah’s.
[8]Isaiah 58:6-7.
[9]I Kings 19:9
[10]Inspired by a teaching from Rabbi Karen Kedar.

Kafka and the Doll

Kafka and the Doll
Kol Nidre 5780
October 8, 2019
Rabbi Alan Cook
Sinai Temple, Champaign, Illinois

A story—possibly apocryphal—is told about the author Franz Kafka.  One day, while walking in a park in Vienna, he encountered a young girl who was distraught because she had lost her doll.  Kafka offered to help her search, but they did not turn up the missing toy.  However, he promised his new friend that he would meet her the next day in the same location.

The next day Kafka returned with a typed letter that he read to the young girl. He told her that it was a message from her lost doll.  It said, “Please do not mourn me; I have gone on a trip to see the world.  I will write you of my adventures.”  The girl took comfort from the letter, and so Kafka continued to create ever more fanciful accounts of the doll’s travels, and he shared them with the girl regularly.

Eventually, the meetings came to an end and Kafka presented the girl with a new doll. This doll clearly looked different from the lost one, but all was explained with an attached letter that read, “My journeys have changed me.”[1]

As we mark a new year and reflect on our actions since last Yom Kippur, we too recognize that our travels have changed us.  The journeys we have taken in this past year, whether they involved far-flung itineraries or they were comprised of moments of physical and emotional shifts, have reshaped our sense of ourselves.  Now, these days of awe call us to reflect upon these changes: some have been joyful, some have been painful.  Some have emerged as welcome expressions of our best selves; some have proven hurtful and harmful, and stand to be lamented—and hopefully, corrected. Some changes represent an ongoing evolution: new skills and opportunities that continue to unfold before our eyes; some represent a closing of doors, an end to a particular chapter of our lives.  Whatever change we may have encountered in the past year, whatever change awaits us in the year just beginning to unfold, we pray that, through the grace of God, we may meet these changes and challenges with strength, courage, and integrity.

Kafka, of course had given much thought to the theme of human transformation and growth.  His 1915 novella, The Metamorphosis, follows Gregor Samsa through a monstrous transformation with which the protagonist is ultimately unable to fully cope. For us, the shifts we make are generally less dramatic; sometimes we may require feedback from family or friends before we fully understand the scope and beauty of our makeover.

A maxim currently making its way through the internet reminds us, “Butterflies cannot see their wings.  They can’t see how beautiful they are, but everyone else can.  People are like that, too.”[2]  Caterpillars go through tremendous effort to build a cocoon and make the transformation to a butterfly.  Some innate species-specific memory tells them that this is a worthwhile endeavor. But when they emerge, they cannot recognize that they have changed; they are unable to understand the full scope of their evolution.  So it is with us.  Oftentimes, until or unless someone else remarks on our transformation, be it external: “I like your new haircut” or internal: “you seem much happier lately,” we fail to fully internalize and appreciate how much we have truly changed.

According to Jewish tradition, true teshuvah, true change in our character that brings us in closer alignment with God’s expectations of us, cannot be achieved unless we engage with others with whom we have interacted over the course of the year and make amends for any way in which we have hurt them, whether purposely or accidentally.[3]  In this manner, Jewish tradition recognizes the power of interpersonal relations; our “travels have changed us” because on our journey through the past year we’ve taken the time to engage with others.  Some of our encounters have been richly rewarding; others have been hurtful or disappointing; all have left a mark on our persona.  Some of these impacts are nearly imperceptible, others are life-altering, but the enduring lesson is that since we do not move through life in a vacuum, we are ever-evolving creatures, shaped by our interactions with others.  

At this season of introspection, we are called to examine how we conduct ourselves in relationship with others.  Have we been cold or sharp or aloof toward those with whom we interact—be they friend, family, or stranger?  Or have we pushed ourselves to be fully open to the ways that each individual may bless our lives?

Once upon a time, in a remote corner of a European village lay decaying monastery with only five remaining monks.   It was clear that their religious order had seen better days.  In the woods nearby the monastery, there was a little hut that a Rabbi from a nearby town used from time to time. The monks always knew the Rabbi was home when they saw the smoke from his fire rise above the tree tops. As the Abbot agonized over the imminent demise of the monastery, it occurred to him to ask the Rabbi if he could offer any advice that might help him avoid the fate that seemed so inevitable.

The Rabbi welcomed the Abbot at his hut. When the Abbot explained the reason for his visit, the Rabbi had scant advice to offer.  “The only thing I can tell you,” said the Rabbi, “is that the Messiah is among you.”

When the Abbot returned to the monastery, his fellow monks gathered around him and asked, “What did the Rabbi say?” 

“He didn’t offer any concrete advice,” the Abbot admitted. “The only thing he did say, as I was leaving, was that the Messiah is among us. But I don’t know exactly what these words mean.”

In the months that followed, the monks thought about the significance of the Rabbi’s words: The Messiah is among us?  Could he possibly have meant that the Messiah is one of us monks here at the monastery?  If that’s the case, which one of us is the Messiah?  Do you suppose he meant the Abbot?  Yes, if he meant anyone, he probably meant Father Abbot.  Certainly, he could not have meant Brother Elred!  Elred gets crotchety at times.  But come to think of it, even so, Elred is almost always right. Maybe the rabbi did mean Brother Elred.  Of course, the Rabbi didn’t mean me.  He couldn’t possibly have meant me.  I’m just an ordinary person.  Yet supposing he did? Suppose I am the Messiah?

As they thought more about what the rabbi had said, the monks began to treat each other with great respect on the off chance that one among them might be the Messiah.   At the same time, each monk began to treat himself with great respect.

It so happened that even in its decline people still occasionally came to visit the beautiful forest and the monastery. Now, visitors began to sense a powerful spiritual aura. They were sensing the respect that now filled the monastery.  Though they didn’t really understand why, people began to come to the monastery even more frequently to picnic, to play, and to pray. They began to bring their friends, and their friends brought their friends.  Then some of the younger men who came to visit the monastery started to talk with the older monks.  After a while, one asked if he could join them.  Then, others asked if they too could join the abbot and older monks.  Within a few years, the monastery once again became a thriving order, a vibrant center of light and spirituality in the community.[4]

Like the monks in this parable, we have the opportunity to see our neighbors—and ourselves—as something greater than the immediate impression we may give to the casual observer.  Whether we embrace the notion of an individual Messiah, or whether we see individuals or ourselves as possible catalysts of a messianic age, our behavior toward others can and should be guided by the understanding that each person has importance and worth, even if it is not readily evident.  Judaism holds dear the notion that we are all created btzelem Elohim, in the Divine image.  When we strive to recognize and celebrate the good and the Godly within everyone whom we encounter—as the monks in the story began to do—we find, like the doll in Kafka’s story, that this sort of compassionate journey may change us for the better.

And being so changed, being so attuned to the Divine spark in others, may in turn inspire us to make changes to the manner in which we welcome and appreciate God in the world and in our lives.  Whether you find yourself to be “religious” or not, whether or not a consciousness of God’s expectations for you informs your day-to-day behavior, each of us arguably derives some benefit, some comfort, some sense of our place in the world by acknowledging the presence of a power higher than ourselves. For many of us, what we call this Power, and how we choose to interact with this Power, remains in flux.  We may rejoice and embrace God when we feel blessed; we may be inclined to shun God or feel angry when tragedy befalls us.  But Jewish tradition assures us that as much as our feelings about God may shift from moment-to-moment, God stands steadfast and immutable.

The Yiddish poet Aharon Zeitlin reminds us that God does not mind how we interact, so long as we care enough to engage with the Divine in some manner.

Praise me, says God, and I will know that you love me.
Curse me, says God, and I will know that you love me.
Praise me or curse me
And I will know that you love me.

Sing out my graces, says God,
Raise your fist against me and revile, says God.
Sing out graces or revile,
Reviling is also a kind of praise,
says God.

But if you sit fenced off in your apathy,
says God,
If you sit entrenched in: "I don't give a hang," says God,
If you look at the stars and yawn,
If you see suffering and don't cry out,
If you don't praise and you don't revile,
Then I created you in vain, says God.[5]

At this season, we invoke God as Avinu Malkeinu, a parent and a ruler.  This phrase is meant to juxtapose two qualities of God: mercy and lovingkindness stand side by side with firmness and justice. As we pray that God will be able to find balance in these qualities, so too do we strive to achieve a similar balance within ourselves.  As Zeitlin writes, God wants us, as representatives of humanity, to make our presence in this world worthwhile—to be changed by our journey.

Doing so requires not only that we examine our interactions with others and our relationship to the Divine; we also must take a close look at ourselves. As we engage in the challenging but rewarding work of teshuvah, we find our tradition encouraging us to engage in the act of cheshbon ha-nefesh, an “accounting of the soul.” As I go through this self-reflection process, I examine myself in the mirror.  I seek to look beyond the few extra pounds, the few fewer hairs, the few new sags and wrinkles. What I should really be looking for in the mirror, what Ishould really be focused on is not the superficial image, but my inner self.  I ask myself: in what ways did I change in 5779?  -- what new skill did I acquire, did I kick that bad habit, discover a new interest, form different attitudes, or champion new causes?  Did I pay attention to a social injustice, did I try to make a positive difference in my community, did I tell a dear one that I loved him or her, was I generous or stingy in my praise or in my rebuke?  Did I have the opportunity to celebrate an auspicious milestone or enjoy the flowering of new or rekindled love?  Did I grapple with disappointment or the pain of loss?  

We are all invited to engage in similar introspection.  Having undergone such an assessment, our tradition then encourages us to act upon these self-discoveries in an effort to shift our destinies in a positive manner.  Whatever our experiences, we recognize that we are not static creatures, standing stoic and unchanged as the seasons march on.  Rather, we are participants in the constant current of time, evolving with each passing moment.  We only hope that we are aware enough of our surroundings to steer ourselves toward positive changes.

Billy walked into the five-and-dime store (remember those?) and went to use the payphone (remember those?).  The clerk at the counter could not help but overhear the conversation.

“Hello, Dr. Silverberg?  I was wondering if you’d like to hire a boy to mow your lawn twice a week and maybe run some errands for you?  Oh, you already have somebody?  Are you satisfied with him?  You are? OK, thank you!  Goodbye.”

As Billy started to leave the store, the clerk stopped him and said, “Listen, if you’re looking for a job, they are hiring here.”

“Thank you, ma’am,” Billy replied, “But I already have a job.”

“But didn’t I hear you asking Dr. Silverberg if you he needed somebody to work for him?”

“Well not exactly,” Billy answered.  “You see, I’m the boy who works for Dr. Silverberg, and I was just checking up on myself.”

From time-to-time we need to check up on ourselves.  We need to honestly examine our thoughts, our deeds, and our words of the past year—for when we recognize our propensity for change and devote ourselves wholeheartedly to it, we begin to delve into the full range of possibilities and obligations associated with teshuvah.  And we may find that this journey of self-reflection has changed us for the better.

We pray that this year of 5780 will be a good, meaningful year filled with blessing for us all.  And when we return to this place next year to gather again for these Days of Awe may we each be able to say that we have been on a marvelous journey, and that we have changed in many positive ways.



[1]Many versions of this story exist.  This account is paraphrased from a telling by May Benatar called “Kafka and the Doll: The Pervasiveness of Loss,” posted on Huffington Post on October 3, 2011.  Retrieved July 23, 2019 from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kafka-and-the-doll_b_981348
[2]This quote is found in many places on the internet.  Its origin is unclear.
[3]A precept taught in Mishnah Yoma 8:9.
[4]Adapted from Peck, M. Scott. The Different Drum: Community Making and Peace.(New York: Touchstone, 1998)
[5]“If You Look at the Stars and Yawn,” by Aharon Zeitlin, trans. Emanuel Goldsmith